mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Curriculum Fine-tuning of Vision Foundation Model for Medical Image Classification Under Label Noise

arXiv 2412.00150 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2024cs.CV eess.IVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks have demonstrated remarkable performance in various vision tasks, but their success heavily depends on the quality of the training data. Noisy labels are a critical issue in medical datasets and can significantly degrade model performance. Previous clean sample selection methods have not utilized the well pre-trained features of vision foundation models (VFMs) and assumed that training begins from scratch. In this paper, we propose CUFIT, a curriculum fine-tuning paradigm of VFMs for medical image classification under label noise. Our method is motivated by the fact that linear probing of VFMs is relatively unaffected by noisy samples, as it does not update the feature extractor of the VFM, thus robustly classifying the training samples. Subsequently, curriculum fine-tuning of two adapters is conducted, starting with clean sample selection from the linear probing phase. Our experimental results demonstrate that CUFIT outperforms previous methods across various medical image benchmarks. Specifically, our method surpasses previous baselines by 5.0%, 2.1%, 4.6%, and 5.8% at a 40% noise rate on the HAM10000, APTOS-2019, BloodMnist, and OrgancMnist datasets, respectively. Furthermore, we provide extensive analyses to demonstrate the impact of our method on noisy label detection. For instance, our method shows higher label precision and recall compared to previous approaches. Our work highlights the potential of leveraging VFMs in medical image classification under challenging conditions of noisy labels.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2024.

Builds on

41 of 62 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  7. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  8. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  9. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  10. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  11. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  12. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
29 more
  1. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  2. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  3. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  5. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  6. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  7. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  9. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
  10. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  11. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  12. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  13. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  14. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  15. 2023AnyDoor: Zero-shot Object-level Image Customizationcited by 412
  16. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  17. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  18. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  19. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  20. 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
  21. 2023Stronger, Fewer, & Superior: Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for Domain Generalized Semantic Segmentationcited by 83
  22. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  23. 2023Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Medical Image Analysis: The Missed Opportunitycited by 56
  24. 2020A Benchmark for Studying Diabetic Retinopathy: Segmentation, Grading, and Transferabilitycited by 49
  25. 2015The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Noisy Data for Fine-Grained Recognitioncited by 48
  26. 2023Robustness of SAM: Segment Anything Under Corruptions and Beyondcited by 31
  27. 2022Robust Medical Image Classification from Noisy Labeled Data with Global and Local Representation Guided Co-trainingcited by 21
  28. 2023Why Is Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models Robust to Noisy Labels?cited by 21
  29. 2024Finding Dino: A Plug-and-Play Framework for Zero-Shot Detection of Out-of-Distribution Objects Using Prototypescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.