mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Segment-Anything Models Achieve Zero-shot Robustness in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2408.09839 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic segmentation is a significant perception task in autonomous driving. It suffers from the risks of adversarial examples. In the past few years, deep learning has gradually transitioned from convolutional neural network (CNN) models with a relatively small number of parameters to foundation models with a huge number of parameters. The segment-anything model (SAM) is a generalized image segmentation framework that is capable of handling various types of images and is able to recognize and segment arbitrary objects in an image without the need to train on a specific object. It is a unified model that can handle diverse downstream tasks, including semantic segmentation, object detection, and tracking. In the task of semantic segmentation for autonomous driving, it is significant to study the zero-shot adversarial robustness of SAM. Therefore, we deliver a systematic empirical study on the robustness of SAM without additional training. Based on the experimental results, the zero-shot adversarial robustness of the SAM under the black-box corruptions and white-box adversarial attacks is acceptable, even without the need for additional training. The finding of this study is insightful in that the gigantic model parameters and huge amounts of training data lead to the phenomenon of emergence, which builds a guarantee of adversarial robustness. SAM is a vision foundation model that can be regarded as an early prototype of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) pipeline. In such a pipeline, a unified model can handle diverse tasks. Therefore, this research not only inspects the impact of vision foundation models on safe autonomous driving but also provides a perspective on developing trustworthy AGI. The code is available at: https://github.com/momo1986/robust_sam_iv.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.

Builds on

45 of 51 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  7. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  8. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  9. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  10. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  11. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  12. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
33 more
  1. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  2. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  4. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
  7. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  8. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  9. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
  10. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  11. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,417
  12. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  13. 2019Segmentation Transformer: Object-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentationcited by 573
  14. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
  15. 2023Faster Segment Anything: Towards Lightweight SAM for Mobile Applicationscited by 345
  16. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  17. 2022OneFormer: One Transformer to Rule Universal Image Segmentationcited by 327
  18. 2023Fast Segment Anythingcited by 286
  19. 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
  20. 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
  21. 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
  22. 2021Rethinking BiSeNet For Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 124
  23. 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
  24. 2018Generalizable Data-free Objective for Crafting Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 88
  25. 2022SegPGD: An Effective and Efficient Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Boosting Segmentation Robustnesscited by 74
  26. 2020GeoDA: a geometric framework for black-box adversarial attackscited by 66
  27. 2019Interlaced Sparse Self-Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 53
  28. 2021Fast Minimum-norm Adversarial Attacks through Adaptive Norm Constraintscited by 50
  29. 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 33
  30. 2023Robustness of SAM: Segment Anything Under Corruptions and Beyondcited by 30
  31. 2023On the Robustness of Segment Anythingcited by 24
  32. 2023Robustness of Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Autonomous Driving in Adverse Weather Conditionscited by 14
  33. 2022Fast and Reliable Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness with Minimum-Margin Attackcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.