mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking the Robustness of Optical Flow Estimation to Corruptions

arXiv 2411.14865 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2024eess.IV cs.CV cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optical flow estimation is extensively used in autonomous driving and video editing. While existing models demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across various benchmarks, the robustness of these methods has been infrequently investigated. Despite some research focusing on the robustness of optical flow models against adversarial attacks, there has been a lack of studies investigating their robustness to common corruptions. Taking into account the unique temporal characteristics of optical flow, we introduce 7 temporal corruptions specifically designed for benchmarking the robustness of optical flow models, in addition to 17 classical single-image corruptions, in which advanced PSF Blur simulation method is performed. Two robustness benchmarks, KITTI-FC and GoPro-FC, are subsequently established as the first corruption robustness benchmark for optical flow estimation, with Out-Of-Domain (OOD) and In-Domain (ID) settings to facilitate comprehensive studies. Robustness metrics, Corruption Robustness Error (CRE), Corruption Robustness Error ratio (CREr), and Relative Corruption Robustness Error (RCRE) are further introduced to quantify the optical flow estimation robustness. 29 model variants from 15 optical flow methods are evaluated, yielding 10 intriguing observations, such as 1) the absolute robustness of the model is heavily dependent on the estimation performance; 2) the corruptions that diminish local information are more serious than that reduce visual effects. We also give suggestions for the design and application of optical flow models. We anticipate that our benchmark will serve as a foundational resource for advancing research in robust optical flow estimation. The benchmarks and source code will be released at https://github.com/ZhonghuaYi/optical_flow_robustness_benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2024.

Builds on

68 of 89 references.

References · 68

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
  6. 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,054
  7. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
  8. 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 878
  9. 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 780
  10. 2016Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dynamic Scene Deblurringcited by 722
  11. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  12. 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 324
38 more
  1. 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 273
  2. 2023Rerender A Video: Zero-Shot Text-Guided Video-to-Video Translationcited by 253
  3. 2021Learning to Estimate Hidden Motions with Global Motion Aggregationcited by 223
  4. 2017UnFlow: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow with a Bidirectional Census Losscited by 202
  5. 2019SelFlow: Self-Supervised Learning of Optical Flowcited by 128
  6. 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
  7. 2020Learning by Analogy: Reliable Supervision from Transformations for Unsupervised Optical Flow Estimationcited by 120
  8. 2023The Surprising Effectiveness of Diffusion Models for Optical Flow and Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 116
  9. 2023Delivering Arbitrary-Modal Semantic Segmentationcited by 115
  10. 2023FlowFormer++: Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Pretraining Optical Flow Estimationcited by 114
  11. 2021Event-Based Fusion for Motion Deblurring with Cross-modal Attentioncited by 112
  12. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 112
  13. 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
  14. 2020FLAVR: Flow-Agnostic Video Representations for Fast Frame Interpolationcited by 97
  15. 2022CRAFT: Cross-Attentional Flow Transformer for Robust Optical Flowcited by 82
  16. 2015EpicFlow: Edge-Preserving Interpolation of Correspondences for Optical Flowcited by 80
  17. 2023FlowVid: Taming Imperfect Optical Flows for Consistent Video-to-Video Synthesiscited by 79
  18. 2021SMURF: Self-Teaching Multi-Frame Unsupervised RAFT with Full-Image Warpingcited by 74
  19. 2016Fast Optical Flow using Dense Inverse Searchcited by 70
  20. 2022SKFlow: Learning Optical Flow with Super Kernelscited by 56
  21. 2020UPFlow: Upsampling Pyramid for Unsupervised Optical Flow Learningcited by 49
  22. 2019Pretraining boosts out-of-domain robustness for pose estimationcited by 47
  23. 2022Review on Panoramic Imaging and Its Applications in Scene Understandingcited by 42
  24. 2019Attacking Optical Flowcited by 41
  25. 2023Understanding the Robustness of 3D Object Detection with Bird's-Eye-View Representations in Autonomous Drivingcited by 37
  26. 2021Benchmarking the Robustness of Spatial-Temporal Models Against Corruptionscited by 35
  27. 2023TransFlow: Transformer as Flow Learnercited by 32
  28. 2023Robustness of SAM: Segment Anything Under Corruptions and Beyondcited by 30
  29. 2023CosPGD: an efficient white-box adversarial attack for pixel-wise prediction taskscited by 27
  30. 2022PanoFlow: Learning 360deg Optical Flow for Surrounding Temporal Understandingcited by 26
  31. 2022Robustness Analysis of Video-Language Models Against Visual and Language Perturbationscited by 23
  32. 2015Flow Fields: Dense Correspondence Fields for Highly Accurate Large Displacement Optical Flow Estimationcited by 22
  33. 2023Video ControlNet: Towards Temporally Consistent Synthetic-to-Real Video Translation Using Conditional Image Diffusion Modelscited by 20
  34. 2023Benchmarking the Robustness of LiDAR Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 18
  35. 2023GAFlow: Incorporating Gaussian Attention into Optical Flowcited by 18
  36. 2021End-to-End Interactive Prediction and Planning with Optical Flow Distillation for Autonomous Drivingcited by 17
  37. 2023MeDM: Mediating Image Diffusion Models for Video-to-Video Translation with Temporal Correspondence Guidancecited by 17
  38. 2020Optical Flow based Visual Potential Field for Autonomous Drivingcited by 16

50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.