Benchmarking the Robustness of Optical Flow Estimation to Corruptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optical flow estimation is extensively used in autonomous driving and video editing. While existing models demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across various benchmarks, the robustness of these methods has been infrequently investigated. Despite some research focusing on the robustness of optical flow models against adversarial attacks, there has been a lack of studies investigating their robustness to common corruptions. Taking into account the unique temporal characteristics of optical flow, we introduce 7 temporal corruptions specifically designed for benchmarking the robustness of optical flow models, in addition to 17 classical single-image corruptions, in which advanced PSF Blur simulation method is performed. Two robustness benchmarks, KITTI-FC and GoPro-FC, are subsequently established as the first corruption robustness benchmark for optical flow estimation, with Out-Of-Domain (OOD) and In-Domain (ID) settings to facilitate comprehensive studies. Robustness metrics, Corruption Robustness Error (CRE), Corruption Robustness Error ratio (CREr), and Relative Corruption Robustness Error (RCRE) are further introduced to quantify the optical flow estimation robustness. 29 model variants from 15 optical flow methods are evaluated, yielding 10 intriguing observations, such as 1) the absolute robustness of the model is heavily dependent on the estimation performance; 2) the corruptions that diminish local information are more serious than that reduce visual effects. We also give suggestions for the design and application of optical flow models. We anticipate that our benchmark will serve as a foundational resource for advancing research in robust optical flow estimation. The benchmarks and source code will be released at https://github.com/ZhonghuaYi/optical_flow_robustness_benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2024.
Builds on
68 of 89 references.
References · 68
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
- 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,054
- 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 878
- 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 780
- 2016Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dynamic Scene Deblurringcited by 722
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 324
38 more
- 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 273
- 2023Rerender A Video: Zero-Shot Text-Guided Video-to-Video Translationcited by 253
- 2021Learning to Estimate Hidden Motions with Global Motion Aggregationcited by 223
- 2017UnFlow: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow with a Bidirectional Census Losscited by 202
- 2019SelFlow: Self-Supervised Learning of Optical Flowcited by 128
- 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
- 2020Learning by Analogy: Reliable Supervision from Transformations for Unsupervised Optical Flow Estimationcited by 120
- 2023The Surprising Effectiveness of Diffusion Models for Optical Flow and Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 116
- 2023Delivering Arbitrary-Modal Semantic Segmentationcited by 115
- 2023FlowFormer++: Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Pretraining Optical Flow Estimationcited by 114
- 2021Event-Based Fusion for Motion Deblurring with Cross-modal Attentioncited by 112
- 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 112
- 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
- 2020FLAVR: Flow-Agnostic Video Representations for Fast Frame Interpolationcited by 97
- 2022CRAFT: Cross-Attentional Flow Transformer for Robust Optical Flowcited by 82
- 2015EpicFlow: Edge-Preserving Interpolation of Correspondences for Optical Flowcited by 80
- 2023FlowVid: Taming Imperfect Optical Flows for Consistent Video-to-Video Synthesiscited by 79
- 2021SMURF: Self-Teaching Multi-Frame Unsupervised RAFT with Full-Image Warpingcited by 74
- 2016Fast Optical Flow using Dense Inverse Searchcited by 70
- 2022SKFlow: Learning Optical Flow with Super Kernelscited by 56
- 2020UPFlow: Upsampling Pyramid for Unsupervised Optical Flow Learningcited by 49
- 2019Pretraining boosts out-of-domain robustness for pose estimationcited by 47
- 2022Review on Panoramic Imaging and Its Applications in Scene Understandingcited by 42
- 2019Attacking Optical Flowcited by 41
- 2023Understanding the Robustness of 3D Object Detection with Bird's-Eye-View Representations in Autonomous Drivingcited by 37
- 2021Benchmarking the Robustness of Spatial-Temporal Models Against Corruptionscited by 35
- 2023TransFlow: Transformer as Flow Learnercited by 32
- 2023Robustness of SAM: Segment Anything Under Corruptions and Beyondcited by 30
- 2023CosPGD: an efficient white-box adversarial attack for pixel-wise prediction taskscited by 27
- 2022PanoFlow: Learning 360deg Optical Flow for Surrounding Temporal Understandingcited by 26
- 2022Robustness Analysis of Video-Language Models Against Visual and Language Perturbationscited by 23
- 2015Flow Fields: Dense Correspondence Fields for Highly Accurate Large Displacement Optical Flow Estimationcited by 22
- 2023Video ControlNet: Towards Temporally Consistent Synthetic-to-Real Video Translation Using Conditional Image Diffusion Modelscited by 20
- 2023Benchmarking the Robustness of LiDAR Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 18
- 2023GAFlow: Incorporating Gaussian Attention into Optical Flowcited by 18
- 2021End-to-End Interactive Prediction and Planning with Optical Flow Distillation for Autonomous Drivingcited by 17
- 2023MeDM: Mediating Image Diffusion Models for Video-to-Video Translation with Temporal Correspondence Guidancecited by 17
- 2020Optical Flow based Visual Potential Field for Autonomous Drivingcited by 16
50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.