mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution Framework Centralized Enough for MARL?

arXiv 2305.17352 ↗First posted 27 May 2023cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) has recently emerged as a popular framework for cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), where agents can use additional global state information to guide training in a centralized way and make their own decisions only based on decentralized local policies. Despite the encouraging results achieved, CTDE makes an independence assumption on agent policies, which limits agents to adopt global cooperative information from each other during centralized training. Therefore, we argue that existing CTDE methods cannot fully utilize global information for training, leading to an inefficient joint-policy exploration and even suboptimal results. In this paper, we introduce a novel Centralized Advising and Decentralized Pruning (CADP) framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning, that not only enables an efficacious message exchange among agents during training but also guarantees the independent policies for execution. Firstly, CADP endows agents the explicit communication channel to seek and take advices from different agents for more centralized training. To further ensure the decentralized execution, we propose a smooth model pruning mechanism to progressively constraint the agent communication into a closed one without degradation in agent cooperation capability. Empirical evaluations on StarCraft II micromanagement and Google Research Football benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves superior performance compared with the state-of-the-art counterparts. Our code will be made publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.

Builds on

40 of 57 references.

References · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  4. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  5. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  6. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  7. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  8. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  9. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  10. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
  11. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  12. 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 260
28 more
  1. 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
  2. 2019Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environmentcited by 257
  3. 2018TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 201
  4. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
  5. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  6. 2018Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 170
  7. 2022SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 118
  8. 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 96
  9. 2019Learning Nearly Decomposable Value Functions Via Communication Minimizationcited by 85
  10. 2019Learning Efficient Multi-agent Communication: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 60
  11. 2020Learning Individually Inferred Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 55
  12. 2021Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Active Voltage Control on Power Distribution Networkscited by 52
  13. 2022Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregationcited by 34
  14. 2022Revisiting Some Common Practices in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
  15. 2019Learning Agent Communication under Limited Bandwidth by Message Pruningcited by 31
  16. 2021Context-Aware Sparse Deep Coordination Graphscited by 27
  17. 2018Modelling the Dynamic Joint Policy of Teammates with Attention Multi-agent DDPGcited by 20
  18. 2022More Centralized Training, Still Decentralized Execution: Multi-Agent Conditional Policy Factorizationcited by 19
  19. 2022Contrastive Identity-Aware Learning for Multi-Agent Value Decompositioncited by 19
  20. 2019Neighborhood Cognition Consistent Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  21. 2022ACE: Cooperative Multi-agent Q-learning with Bidirectional Action-Dependencycited by 15
  22. 2022Rethinking Individual Global Max in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  23. 2022PTDE: Personalized Training with Distilled Execution for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  24. 2022Interaction Pattern Disentangling for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  25. 2023Attention-Based Recurrence for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning under Stochastic Partial Observabilitycited by 8
  26. 2021Action Candidate Based Clipped Double Q-learning for Discrete and Continuous Action Taskscited by 7
  27. 2022CTDS: Centralized Teacher with Decentralized Student for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  28. 2022MA2QL: A Minimalist Approach to Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 10; 2026: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making: Scenarios, Approaches, Challenges and Perspectivescited by 27
  2. 2024A2PO: Towards Effective Offline Reinforcement Learning from an Advantage-aware Perspectivecited by 10
  3. 2024Mean-Field Sampling for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  4. 2024On Stateful Value Factorization in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  5. 2024MARLIN: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Guided by Language-Based Inter-Robot Negotiationcited by 5
  6. 2024Cooperation and Fairness in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  7. 2025URB -- Urban Routing Benchmark for RL-equipped Connected Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
  8. 2025Multi-Agent Guided Policy Optimizationcited by 3
  9. 2025LLM-Enhanced Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Expert Workflow for Real-Time P2P Energy Tradingcited by 2
  10. 2026ExToken: Structured Exploration for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Reinforcement Fine-tuningcited by 2
  11. 2025Hierarchical Message-Passing Policies for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  12. 2024Tacit Learning with Adaptive Information Selection for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
6 more
  1. 2025CSAOT: Cooperative Multi-Agent System for Active Object Trackingcited by 0
  2. 2025An Efficient Approach for Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning Problemscited by 0
  3. 2025Bi-level Mean Field: Dynamic Grouping for Large-Scale MARLcited by 0
  4. 2025Enhancing Aerial Combat Tactics through Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  5. 2025Action Dependency Graphs for Globally Optimal Coordinated Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026In Trust We Survive: Emergent Trust Learningcited by 0