PTDE: Personalized Training with Distilled Execution for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) has emerged as a widely adopted paradigm in multi-agent reinforcement learning, emphasizing the utilization of global information for learning an enhanced joint Q-function or centralized critic. In contrast, our investigation delves into harnessing global information to directly enhance individual Q-functions or individual actors. Notably, we discover that applying identical global information universally across all agents proves insufficient for optimal performance. Consequently, we advocate for the customization of global information tailored to each agent, creating agent-personalized global information to bolster overall performance. Furthermore, we introduce a novel paradigm named Personalized Training with Distilled Execution (PTDE), wherein agent-personalized global information is distilled into the agent's local information. This distilled information is then utilized during decentralized execution, resulting in minimal performance degradation. PTDE can be seamlessly integrated with state-of-the-art algorithms, leading to notable performance enhancements across diverse benchmarks, including the SMAC benchmark, Google Research Football (GRF) benchmark, and Learning to Rank (LTR) task.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.
Builds on
21 of 32 references.
References · 21
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
- 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
- 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
- 2019Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environmentcited by 257
9 more
- 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
- 2017Towards Optimally Decentralized Multi-Robot Collision Avoidance via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
- 2021Rethinking the Implementation Tricks and Monotonicity Constraint in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2019Learning Agent Communication under Limited Bandwidth by Message Pruningcited by 31
- 2021Coach-Player Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Team Compositioncited by 28
- 2021SEIHAI: A Sample-efficient Hierarchical AI for the MineRL Competitioncited by 20
- 2022UNMAS: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Unshaped Cooperative Scenarioscited by 9
- 2022CTDS: Centralized Teacher with Decentralized Student for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2022Efficient Policy Generation in Multi-Agent Systems via Hypergraph Neural Networkcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
11 papers.
- 2025Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
- 2025Towards AI Search Paradigmcited by 19
- 2023Is Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution Framework Centralized Enough for MARL?cited by 18
- 2026Auditing Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning Trees Outperforms Majority Vote and LLM-as-Judgecited by 16
- 2026JADE: Bridging the Strategic-Operational Gap in Dynamic Agentic RAGcited by 6
- 2023Inducing Stackelberg Equilibrium through Spatio-Temporal Sequential Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2025Multi-Agent Guided Policy Optimizationcited by 3
- 2024Fusion-PSRO: Nash Policy Fusion for Policy Space Response Oraclescited by 2
- 2025Optimization without Future Compromises? Decentralized Coordination via Collective and Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Interactive Distillation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026PC3D: Zero-Shot Cooperation Across Variable Rosters via Personalized Context Distillationcited by 0
- 2026PC3D: Zero-Shot Cooperation Across Variable Rosters via Personalized Context Distillation11 May 2026
- 2026Auditing Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning Trees Outperforms Majority Vote and LLM-as-Judge10 Feb 2026
- 2026JADE: Bridging the Strategic-Operational Gap in Dynamic Agentic RAG29 Jan 2026
- 2026Interactive Distillation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning8 Jan 2026
- 2025Optimization without Future Compromises? Decentralized Coordination via Collective and Reinforcement Learning22 Sep 2025
- 2025Multi-Agent Guided Policy Optimization24 Jul 2025
- 2025Towards AI Search Paradigm20 Jun 2025
- 2025Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning25 Jan 2025
- 2024Fusion-PSRO: Nash Policy Fusion for Policy Space Response Oracles31 May 2024
- 2023Is Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution Framework Centralized Enough for MARL?27 May 2023
- 2023Inducing Stackelberg Equilibrium through Spatio-Temporal Sequential Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning20 Apr 2023