mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PTDE: Personalized Training with Distilled Execution for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2210.08872 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2022cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) has emerged as a widely adopted paradigm in multi-agent reinforcement learning, emphasizing the utilization of global information for learning an enhanced joint Q-function or centralized critic. In contrast, our investigation delves into harnessing global information to directly enhance individual Q-functions or individual actors. Notably, we discover that applying identical global information universally across all agents proves insufficient for optimal performance. Consequently, we advocate for the customization of global information tailored to each agent, creating agent-personalized global information to bolster overall performance. Furthermore, we introduce a novel paradigm named Personalized Training with Distilled Execution (PTDE), wherein agent-personalized global information is distilled into the agent's local information. This distilled information is then utilized during decentralized execution, resulting in minimal performance degradation. PTDE can be seamlessly integrated with state-of-the-art algorithms, leading to notable performance enhancements across diverse benchmarks, including the SMAC benchmark, Google Research Football (GRF) benchmark, and Learning to Rank (LTR) task.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  4. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  5. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  6. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  7. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  8. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
  9. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
  10. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  11. 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
  12. 2019Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environmentcited by 257
9 more
  1. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
  2. 2017Towards Optimally Decentralized Multi-Robot Collision Avoidance via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
  3. 2021Rethinking the Implementation Tricks and Monotonicity Constraint in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  4. 2019Learning Agent Communication under Limited Bandwidth by Message Pruningcited by 31
  5. 2021Coach-Player Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Team Compositioncited by 28
  6. 2021SEIHAI: A Sample-efficient Hierarchical AI for the MineRL Competitioncited by 20
  7. 2022UNMAS: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Unshaped Cooperative Scenarioscited by 9
  8. 2022CTDS: Centralized Teacher with Decentralized Student for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  9. 2022Efficient Policy Generation in Multi-Agent Systems via Hypergraph Neural Networkcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

11 papers.