Reconstruction Error-based Anomaly Detection with Few Outlying Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reconstruction error-based neural architectures constitute a classical deep learning approach to anomaly detection which has shown great performances. It consists in training an Autoencoder to reconstruct a set of examples deemed to represent the normality and then to point out as anomalies those data that show a sufficiently large reconstruction error. Unfortunately, these architectures often become able to well reconstruct also the anomalies in the data. This phenomenon is more evident when there are anomalies in the training set. In particular when these anomalies are labeled, a setting called semi-supervised, the best way to train Autoencoders is to ignore anomalies and minimize the reconstruction error on normal data. The goal of this work is to investigate approaches to allow reconstruction error-based architectures to instruct the model to put known anomalies outside of the domain description of the normal data. Specifically, our strategy exploits a limited number of anomalous examples to increase the contrast between the reconstruction error associated with normal examples and those associated with both known and unknown anomalies, thus enhancing anomaly detection performances. The experiments show that this new procedure achieves better performances than the standard Autoencoder approach and the main deep learning techniques for semi-supervised anomaly detection.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2023.
Builds on
24 of 81 references.
References · 24
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
- 2018GANomaly: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection via Adversarial Trainingcited by 409
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
- 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 212
- 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
- 2019Deep Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networkscited by 152
- 2022Catching Both Gray and Black Swans: Open-set Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 104
- 2022Generative Cooperative Learning for Unsupervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 102
- 2021UBnormal: New Benchmark for Supervised Open-Set Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 91
12 more
- 2020A Background-Agnostic Framework with Adversarial Training for Abnormal Event Detection in Videocited by 85
- 2014Toward Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 73
- 2018Generative Adversarial Active Learning for Unsupervised Outlier Detectioncited by 65
- 2019Robust Anomaly Detection in Images using Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 38
- 2021Learning Not to Reconstruct Anomaliescited by 31
- 2021DASVDD: Deep Autoencoding Support Vector Data Descriptor for Anomaly Detectioncited by 21
- 2023Unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms on real-world data: how many do we need?cited by 20
- 2017Limiting the Reconstruction Capability of Generative Neural Network using Negative Learningcited by 16
- 2022IoT Anomaly Detection Methods and Applications: A Surveycited by 14
- 2022Composite Score for Anomaly Detection in Imbalanced Real-World Industrial Datasetcited by 7
- 2019CFOF: A Concentration Free Measure for Anomaly Detectioncited by 2
- 2020A3: Activation Anomaly Analysiscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Novelty Detection in Reinforcement Learning with World Modelscited by 8
- 2024QUCE: The Minimisation and Quantification of Path-Based Uncertainty for Generative Counterfactual Explanationscited by 4
- 2025Link-Aware Energy-Frugal Continual Learning for Fault Detection in IoT Networkscited by 1
- 2025Fast reconstruction-based ROI triggering via anomaly detection in the CYGNO optical TPCcited by 1
- 2026Variational Autoencoders for P-wave Detection on Strong Motion Earthquake Spectrogramscited by 0
- 2026Variational Autoencoders for P-wave Detection on Strong Motion Earthquake Spectrograms9 Jan 2026
- 2025Fast reconstruction-based ROI triggering via anomaly detection in the CYGNO optical TPC30 Dec 2025
- 2025Link-Aware Energy-Frugal Continual Learning for Fault Detection in IoT Networks15 Dec 2025
- 2024QUCE: The Minimisation and Quantification of Path-Based Uncertainty for Generative Counterfactual Explanations27 Feb 2024
- 2023Novelty Detection in Reinforcement Learning with World Models12 Oct 2023