mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Image Matching by Bare Homography

arXiv 2305.08946 ↗First posted 15 May 2023cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents Slime, a novel non-deep image matching framework which models the scene as rough local overlapping planes. This intermediate representation sits in-between the local affine approximation of the keypoint patches and the global matching based on both spatial and similarity constraints, providing a progressive pruning of the correspondences, as planes are easier to handle with respect to general scenes. Slime decomposes the images into overlapping regions at different scales and computes loose planar homographies. Planes are mutually extended by compatible matches and the images are split into fixed tiles, with only the best homographies retained for each pair of tiles. Stable matches are identified according to the consensus of the admissible stereo configurations provided by pairwise homographies. Within tiles, the rough planes are then merged according to their overlap in terms of matches and further consistent correspondences are extracted. The whole process only involves homography constraints. As a result, both the coverage and the stability of correct matches over the scene are amplified, together with the ability to spot matches in challenging scenes, allowing traditional hybrid matching pipelines to make up lost ground against recent end-to-end deep matching methods. In addition, the paper gives a thorough comparative analysis of recent state-of-the-art in image matching represented by end-to-end deep networks and hybrid pipelines. The evaluation considers both planar and non-planar scenes, taking into account critical and challenging scenarios including abrupt temporal image changes and strong variations in relative image rotations. According to this analysis, although the impressive progress done in this field, there is still a wide room for improvements to be investigated in future research.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2023.

Builds on

35 of 70 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  2. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
  3. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,313
  4. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 974
  5. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 731
  6. 2019BlendedMVS: A Large-scale Dataset for Generalized Multi-view Stereo Networkscited by 487
  7. 2019D2-Net: A Trainable CNN for Joint Detection and Description of Local Featurescited by 324
  8. 2020DISK: Learning local features with policy gradientcited by 310
  9. 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 261
  10. 2019Kornia: an Open Source Differentiable Computer Vision Library for PyTorchcited by 231
  11. 2020Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practicecited by 224
  12. 2017Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning losscited by 212
23 more
  1. 2021COTR: Correspondence Transformer for Matching Across Imagescited by 182
  2. 2017Learning to Find Good Correspondencescited by 176
  3. 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 174
  4. 2019MAGSAC++, a fast, reliable and accurate robust estimatorcited by 160
  5. 2019Learning Two-View Correspondences and Geometry Using Order-Aware Networkcited by 148
  6. 2022QuadTree Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 129
  7. 2022MatchFormer: Interleaving Attention in Transformers for Feature Matchingcited by 126
  8. 2019Key.Net: Keypoint Detection by Handcrafted and Learned CNN Filterscited by 117
  9. 2021Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Themcited by 113
  10. 2022LaMAR: Benchmarking Localization and Mapping for Augmented Realitycited by 98
  11. 2021PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Networkcited by 80
  12. 2017Repeatability Is Not Enough: Learning Affine Regions via Discriminabilitycited by 57
  13. 2022A case for using rotation invariant features in state of the art feature matcherscited by 27
  14. 2015MODS: Fast and Robust Method for Two-View Matchingcited by 26
  15. 2015WxBS: Wide Baseline Stereo Generalizationscited by 23
  16. 2019An Evaluation of Feature Matchers for Fundamental Matrix Estimationcited by 18
  17. 2022ECO-TR: Efficient Correspondences Finding Via Coarse-to-Fine Refinementcited by 18
  18. 2015Learning to Assign Orientations to Feature Pointscited by 16
  19. 2020AdaLAM: Revisiting Handcrafted Outlier Detectioncited by 14
  20. 2023A Large Scale Homography Benchmarkcited by 13
  21. 2021SIFT Matching by Context Exposedcited by 9
  22. 2021Finding Geometric Models by Clustering in the Consensus Spacecited by 8
  23. 2021HarrisZ^+: Harris Corner Selection for Next-Gen Image Matching Pipelinescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.