Monitoring Misuse for Accountable 'Artificial Intelligence as a Service'
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI is increasingly being offered 'as a service' (AIaaS). This entails service providers offering customers access to pre-built AI models and services, for tasks such as object recognition, text translation, text-to-voice conversion, and facial recognition, to name a few. The offerings enable customers to easily integrate a range of powerful AI-driven capabilities into their applications. Customers access these models through the provider's APIs, sending particular data to which models are applied, the results of which returned. However, there are many situations in which the use of AI can be problematic. AIaaS services typically represent generic functionality, available 'at a click'. Providers may therefore, for reasons of reputation or responsibility, seek to ensure that the AIaaS services they offer are being used by customers for 'appropriate' purposes. This paper introduces and explores the concept whereby AIaaS providers uncover situations of possible service misuse by their customers. Illustrated through topical examples, we consider the technical usage patterns that could signal situations warranting scrutiny, and raise some of the legal and technical challenges of monitoring for misuse. In all, by introducing this concept, we indicate a potential area for further inquiry from a range of perspectives.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
- 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 77
- 2023Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chainscited by 39
- 2023Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"cited by 15
- 2026Trustworthy AI Posture (TAIP): A Framework for Continuous AI Assurance of Agentic Systems at Horizontal and Vertical scalecited by 1
- 2026Know Your Scientist: KYC as Biosecurity Infrastructurecited by 0
- 2026Trustworthy AI Posture (TAIP): A Framework for Continuous AI Assurance of Agentic Systems at Horizontal and Vertical scale15 Feb 2026
- 2026Know Your Scientist: KYC as Biosecurity Infrastructure5 Feb 2026
- 2024Visibility into AI Agents23 Jan 2024
- 2023Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chains28 Apr 2023
- 2023Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"2 Feb 2023
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices4 Oct 2021