mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Technical Typology of AI Systems in Public Administration

arXiv 2606.31755 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2026cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector often treats "AI" as a single category, neglecting technical distinctions between different AI systems. But these distinctions affect how different systems impact core public values like accountability, procedural justice, and non-discrimination. This paper argues that public administration research would benefit from more technical precision on "AI" and makes three contributions to this end. First, we introduce a typology of five categories of AI systems: hand-coded, glass-box, black-box, general-purpose, and agentic systems. We calibrate the typology to public administration by grouping system types by their distinct implications for public values. Second, we evaluate technical precision in recent public administration research about AI by coding 91 highly-cited papers (2019-2025) using our typology. We find widespread imprecision: most papers (55%) leave the studied system underspecified, 31% motivate their work with a different system than they study, and 41% make more general conclusions than the studied system supports. Finally, we give practical recommendations for future research. We highlight common pitfalls to avoid, and suggest that researchers should, at a minimum, provide enough technical detail to locate the studied system in our typology. To this end, we provide a practical guide -- a short set of diagnostic questions answerable from public information and without specialist technical knowledge.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 149 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

Builds on

35 of 149 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  5. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  6. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  7. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  8. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  9. 2023Foundation Models in Robotics: Applications, Challenges, and the Futurecited by 216
  10. 2022OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and conceptscited by 177
  11. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 174
  12. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 137
23 more
  1. 2023Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systemscited by 135
  2. 2024On the Conversational Persuasiveness of Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trialcited by 109
  3. 2018The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairnesscited by 95
  4. 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81
  5. 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 79
  6. 2023LLM-in-the-loop: Leveraging Large Language Model for Thematic Analysiscited by 70
  7. 2023Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chainscited by 40
  8. 2024Recent Advances of Multimodal Continual Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 39
  9. 2025Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and Governancecited by 30
  10. 2020Algorithmic Risk Assessments Can Alter Human Decision-Making Processes in High-Stakes Government Contextscited by 22
  11. 2021Human-AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision-Making: "Automation Bias" and "Selective Adherence" to Algorithmic Advicecited by 22
  12. 2026A Positive Case for Faithfulness: LLM Self-Explanations Help Predict Model Behaviorcited by 13
  13. 2025The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by Algorithmcited by 11
  14. 2024Generative AI is already widespread in the public sectorcited by 10
  15. 2025Oversight Structures for Agentic AI in Public-Sector Organizationscited by 6
  16. 2022Legitimacy, Authority, and Democratic Duties of Explanationcited by 4
  17. 2024AI for bureaucratic productivity: Measuring the potential of AI to help automate 143 million UK government transactionscited by 4
  18. 2025AI Trust Reshaping Administrative Burdens: Understanding Trust-Burden Dynamics in LLM-Assisted Benefits Systemscited by 4
  19. 2024Artificial intelligence, rationalization, and the limits of control in the public sector: the case of tax policy optimizationcited by 3
  20. 2025Distinguishing Task-Specific and General-Purpose AI in Regulationcited by 3
  21. 2026Agent Benchmarks Fail Public Sector Requirementscited by 3
  22. 2025Leveraging LLMs to Streamline the Review of Public Funding Applicationscited by 1
  23. 2025OxEnsemble: Fair Ensembles for Low-Data Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control
  2. 2026Pluralism in AI Governance: Toward Sociotechnical Alignment and Normative Coherence ↗
  3. 2025Artificial Authority: From Machine Minds to Political Alignments. An Experimental Analysis of Democratic and Autocratic Biases in Large-Language Models
  4. 2025SAIF: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the Risks of Generative AI in the Public Sector
  5. 2025AI Agents and the Law
  6. 2021The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety
  7. 2025Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs
  8. 2025Will Power Return to the Clouds? From Divine Authority to GenAI Authority