Assistive AI for Augmenting Human Decision-making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Regulatory frameworks for the use of AI are emerging. However, they trail behind the fast-evolving malicious AI technologies that can quickly cause lasting societal damage. In response, we introduce a pioneering Assistive AI framework designed to enhance human decision-making capabilities. This framework aims to establish a trust network across various fields, especially within legal contexts, serving as a proactive complement to ongoing regulatory efforts. Central to our framework are the principles of privacy, accountability, and credibility. In our methodology, the foundation of reliability of information and information sources is built upon the ability to uphold accountability, enhance security, and protect privacy. This approach supports, filters, and potentially guides communication, thereby empowering individuals and communities to make well-informed decisions based on cutting-edge advancements in AI. Our framework uses the concept of Boards as proxies to collectively ensure that AI-assisted decisions are reliable, accountable, and in alignment with societal values and legal standards. Through a detailed exploration of our framework, including its main components, operations, and sample use cases, the paper shows how AI can assist in the complex process of decision-making while maintaining human oversight. The proposed framework not only extends regulatory landscapes but also highlights the synergy between AI technology and human judgement, underscoring the potential of AI to serve as a vital instrument in discerning reality from fiction and thus enhancing the decision-making process. Furthermore, we provide domain-specific use cases to highlight the applicability of our framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 184 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2024.
Builds on
58 of 184 references.
References · 58
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2023Video-LLaMA: An Instruction-tuned Audio-Visual Language Model for Video Understandingcited by 1,471
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
- 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,175
38 more
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 939
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 531
- 2023MotionGPT: Human Motion as a Foreign Languagecited by 527
- 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
- 2023Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinionscited by 255
- 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logiccited by 235
- 2023PIXIU: A Large Language Model, Instruction Data and Evaluation Benchmark for Financecited by 222
- 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
- 2023AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutionscited by 188
- 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 165
- 2023Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systemscited by 157
- 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
- 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
- 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Paperscited by 104
- 2018A generic framework for privacy preserving deep learningcited by 103
- 2023Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Modelscited by 101
- 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
- 2020Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphscited by 74
- 2022Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governancecited by 67
- 2023The Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 66
- 2023DISC-FinLLM: A Chinese Financial Large Language Model based on Multiple Experts Fine-tuningcited by 64
- 2023Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Natural Language to First-Order Logic Translationcited by 59
- 2023Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaborationcited by 52
- 2023Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chainscited by 40
- 2023Model Tuning or Prompt Tuning? A Study of Large Language Models for Clinical Concept and Relation Extractioncited by 32
- 2015The Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Reviewcited by 27
- 2023Superhuman Artificial Intelligence Can Improve Human Decision Making by Increasing Noveltycited by 27
- 2022Neural Re-ranking in Multi-stage Recommender Systems: A Reviewcited by 20
- 2022Multimodal Learning on Graphs for Disease Relation Extractioncited by 15
- 2022The Fairness of Credit Scoring Modelscited by 15
- 2022Explainable Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 15
- 2021Filling gaps in trustworthy development of AIcited by 14
- 2022Measuring "Why" in Recommender Systems: a Comprehensive Survey on the Evaluation of Explainable Recommendationcited by 14
- 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 9
- 2023Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence: Workshop Proceedingscited by 9
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.