mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tuning the Right Foundation Models is What you Need for Partial Label Learning

arXiv 2506.05027 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Partial label learning (PLL) seeks to train generalizable classifiers from datasets with inexact supervision, a common challenge in real-world applications. Existing studies have developed numerous approaches to progressively refine and recover ground-truth labels by training convolutional neural networks. However, limited attention has been given to foundation models that offer transferrable representations. In this work, we empirically conduct comprehensive evaluations of 11 foundation models across 13 PLL approaches on 8 benchmark datasets under 3 PLL scenarios. We further propose PartialCLIP, an efficient fine-tuning framework for foundation models in PLL. Our findings reveal that current PLL approaches tend to 1) achieve significant performance gains when using foundation models, 2) exhibit remarkably similar performance to each other, 3) maintain stable performance across varying ambiguity levels, while 4) are susceptible to foundation model selection and adaptation strategies. Additionally, we demonstrate the efficacy of text-embedding classifier initialization and effective candidate label filtering using zero-shot CLIP. Our experimental results and analysis underscore the limitations of current PLL approaches and provide valuable insights for developing more generalizable PLL models. The source code can be found at https://github.com/SEU-hk/PartialCLIP.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

45 of 67 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  8. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  9. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  11. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  12. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
33 more
  1. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  2. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  3. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  4. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  5. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
  6. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  7. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
  8. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  9. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  10. 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 705
  11. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 618
  12. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classificationcited by 362
  13. 2023Demystifying CLIP Datacited by 270
  14. 2021Fine-Grained Image Analysis with Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 135
  15. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  16. 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
  17. 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
  18. 2023Long-Tail Learning with Foundation Model: Heavy Fine-Tuning Hurtscited by 58
  19. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  20. 2020Structured Prediction with Partial Labelling through the Infimum Losscited by 34
  21. 2022SoLar: Sinkhorn Label Refinery for Imbalanced Partial-Label Learningcited by 31
  22. 2017Learning from Ambiguously Labeled Face Imagescited by 29
  23. 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
  24. 2023Long-Tailed Partial Label Learning via Dynamic Rebalancingcited by 22
  25. 2021On the Robustness of Average Losses for Partial-Label Learningcited by 20
  26. 2024Candidate Pseudolabel Learning: Enhancing Vision-Language Models by Prompt Tuning with Unlabeled Datacited by 20
  27. 2020Network Cooperation with Progressive Disambiguation for Partial Label Learningcited by 13
  28. 2025Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithmscited by 12
  29. 2023CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
  30. 2023Towards Effective Visual Representations for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
  31. 2023Disambiguated Attention Embedding for Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learningcited by 10
  32. 2025Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning with Margin Adjustmentcited by 5
  33. 2023A Confidence-based Partial Label Learning Model for Crowd-Annotated Named Entity Recognitioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.