Robust Partial-Label Learning by Leveraging Class Activation Values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world training data is often noisy; for example, human annotators assign conflicting class labels to the same instances. Partial-label learning (PLL) is a weakly supervised learning paradigm that allows training classifiers in this context without manual data cleaning. While state-of-the-art methods have good predictive performance, their predictions are sensitive to high noise levels, out-of-distribution data, and adversarial perturbations. We propose a novel PLL method based on subjective logic, which explicitly represents uncertainty by leveraging the magnitudes of the underlying neural network's class activation values. Thereby, we effectively incorporate prior knowledge about the class labels by using a novel label weight re-distribution strategy that we prove to be optimal. We empirically show that our method yields more robust predictions in terms of predictive performance under high PLL noise levels, handling out-of-distribution examples, and handling adversarial perturbations on the test instances.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.
Builds on
26 of 69 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
- 2022Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: Are Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information Appropriate Measures?cited by 125
14 more
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
- 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
- 2019Partial Label Learning with Self-Guided Retrainingcited by 47
- 2023Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?cited by 40
- 2020Structured Prediction with Partial Labelling through the Infimum Losscited by 34
- 2024Semi-supervised Credit Card Fraud Detection via Attribute-Driven Graph Representationcited by 26
- 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
- 2023Two Sides of Miscalibration: Identifying Over and Under-Confidence Prediction for Network Calibrationcited by 14
- 2023CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
- 2022On the Calibration of Probabilistic Classifier Setscited by 8
- 2024Partial-Label Learning with a Reject Optioncited by 3
- 2025Partial-Label Learning with Conformal Candidate Cleaningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.