mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Partial-Label Learning with Conformal Candidate Cleaning

arXiv 2502.07661 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world data is often ambiguous; for example, human annotation produces instances with multiple conflicting class labels. Partial-label learning (PLL) aims at training a classifier in this challenging setting, where each instance is associated with a set of candidate labels and one correct, but unknown, class label. A multitude of algorithms targeting this setting exists and, to enhance their prediction quality, several extensions that are applicable across a wide range of PLL methods have been introduced. While many of these extensions rely on heuristics, this article proposes a novel enhancing method that incrementally prunes candidate sets using conformal prediction. To work around the missing labeled validation set, which is typically required for conformal prediction, we propose a strategy that alternates between training a PLL classifier to label the validation set, leveraging these predicted class labels for calibration, and pruning candidate labels that are not part of the resulting conformal sets. In this sense, our method alternates between empirical risk minimization and candidate set pruning. We establish that our pruning method preserves the conformal validity with respect to the unknown ground truth. Our extensive experiments on artificial and real-world data show that the proposed approach significantly improves the test set accuracies of several state-of-the-art PLL classifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.

Builds on

21 of 63 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  3. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  5. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
  6. 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 355
  7. 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 272
  8. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  9. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  10. 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
  11. 2023Who Should Predict? Exact Algorithms For Learning to Defer to Humanscited by 70
  12. 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
9 more
  1. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  2. 2015Fast rates in statistical and online learningcited by 47
  3. 2019Partial Label Learning with Self-Guided Retrainingcited by 47
  4. 2023Predictor-Rejector Multi-Class Abstention: Theoretical Analysis and Algorithmscited by 36
  5. 2016Fast Rates for General Unbounded Loss Functions: from ERM to Generalized Bayescited by 27
  6. 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
  7. 2023CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
  8. 2023Conformal Prediction with Partially Labeled Datacited by 5
  9. 2024Partial-Label Learning with a Reject Optioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.