mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Partial-Label Learning with a Reject Option

arXiv 2402.00592 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In real-world applications, one often encounters ambiguously labeled data, where different annotators assign conflicting class labels. Partial-label learning allows training classifiers in this weakly supervised setting, where state-of-the-art methods already show good predictive performance. However, even the best algorithms give incorrect predictions, which can have severe consequences when they impact actions or decisions. We propose a novel risk-consistent nearest-neighbor-based partial-label learning algorithm with a reject option, that is, the algorithm can reject unsure predictions. Extensive experiments on artificial and real-world datasets show that our method provides the best trade-off between the number and accuracy of non-rejected predictions when compared to our competitors, which use confidence thresholds for rejecting unsure predictions. When evaluated without the reject option, our nearest-neighbor-based approach also achieves competitive prediction performance.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.

Builds on

30 of 97 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,902
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,328
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,024
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,902
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,340
  6. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 910
  7. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 729
  8. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 418
  9. 2022Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: Are Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information Appropriate Measures?cited by 125
  10. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  11. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  12. 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
18 more
  1. 2023Who Should Predict? Exact Algorithms For Learning to Defer to Humanscited by 70
  2. 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 60
  3. 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
  4. 2020Classification with Rejection Based on Cost-sensitive Classificationcited by 55
  5. 2016On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Productscited by 52
  6. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  7. 2019Partial Label Learning with Self-Guided Retrainingcited by 47
  8. 2019On the Calibration of Multiclass Classification with Rejectioncited by 41
  9. 2023Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?cited by 40
  10. 2023Predictor-Rejector Multi-Class Abstention: Theoretical Analysis and Algorithmscited by 36
  11. 2020Structured Prediction with Partial Labelling through the Infimum Losscited by 34
  12. 2020Regression with reject option and application to kNNcited by 30
  13. 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
  14. 2021An evidential classifier based on Dempster-Shafer theory and deep learningcited by 18
  15. 2023Two Sides of Miscalibration: Identifying Over and Under-Confidence Prediction for Network Calibrationcited by 14
  16. 2018Decision-Making with Belief Functions: a Reviewcited by 13
  17. 2023CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
  18. 2023Regression with Cost-based Rejectioncited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.