mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Best-of-Three-Worlds Linear Bandit Algorithm with Variance-Adaptive Regret Bounds

arXiv 2302.12370 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a linear bandit algorithm that is adaptive to environments at two different levels of hierarchy. At the higher level, the proposed algorithm adapts to a variety of types of environments. More precisely, it achieves best-of-three-worlds regret bounds, i.e., of O(√T log T) for adversarial environments and of O(fraclog TDeltamin + √fracC log TDeltamin) for stochastic environments with adversarial corruptions, where T, Deltamin, and C denote, respectively, the time horizon, the minimum sub-optimality gap, and the total amount of the corruption. Note that polynomial factors in the dimensionality are omitted here. At the lower level, in each of the adversarial and stochastic regimes, the proposed algorithm adapts to certain environmental characteristics, thereby performing better. The proposed algorithm has data-dependent regret bounds that depend on all of the cumulative loss for the optimal action, the total quadratic variation, and the path-length of the loss vector sequence. In addition, for stochastic environments, the proposed algorithm has a variance-adaptive regret bound of O(fracσ2 log TDeltamin) as well, where σ2 denotes the maximum variance of the feedback loss. The proposed algorithm is based on the SCRiBLe algorithm. By incorporating into this a new technique we call scaled-up sampling, we obtain high-level adaptability, and by incorporating the technique of optimistic online learning, we obtain low-level adaptability.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2023.

Builds on

25 of 53 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Modelcited by 127
  2. 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 124
  3. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 119
  4. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  5. 2019Better Algorithms for Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 92
  6. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
  7. 2019Corruption-robust exploration in episodic reinforcement learningcited by 72
  8. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
  9. 2020Stochastic Linear Bandits Robust to Adversarial Attackscited by 65
  10. 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
  11. 2016The End of Optimism? An Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Armed Linear Banditscited by 49
  12. 2020Simultaneously Learning Stochastic and Adversarial Episodic MDPs with Known Transitioncited by 48
13 more
  1. 2021Achieving Near Instance-Optimality and Minimax-Optimality in Stochastic and Adversarial Linear Bandits Simultaneouslycited by 48
  2. 2021The best of both worlds: stochastic and adversarial episodic MDPs with unknown transitioncited by 40
  3. 2023A Blackbox Approach to Best of Both Worlds in Bandits and Beyondcited by 30
  4. 2019Stochastic Linear Optimization with Adversarial Corruptioncited by 24
  5. 2019Improved Path-length Regret Bounds for Banditscited by 23
  6. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Bandits with Offline Regression Oraclescited by 21
  7. 2021On Optimal Robustness to Adversarial Corruption in Online Decision Problemscited by 21
  8. 2022Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Partial Monitoringcited by 19
  9. 2023Best of Both Worlds Policy Optimizationcited by 17
  10. 2019Solving Linear Programs with Sqrt(rank) Linear System Solvescited by 15
  11. 2022Adversarially Robust Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithm with Variance-Dependent Regret Boundscited by 12
  12. 2015Tight Bounds for Approximate Carath'eodory and Beyondcited by 8
  13. 2018Universal Barrier is n-Self-Concordantcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: