mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader Approaches Best-of-Both-Worlds for the m-Set Semi-Bandit Problems

arXiv 2504.07307 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a common case of the combinatorial semi-bandit problem, the m-set semi-bandit, where the learner exactly selects m arms from the total d arms. In the adversarial setting, the best regret bound, known to be O(√nmd) for time horizon n, is achieved by the well-known Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) policy. However, this requires to explicitly compute the arm-selection probabilities via optimizing problems at each time step and sample according to them. This problem can be avoided by the Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) policy, which simply pulls the m arms that rank among the m smallest (estimated) loss with random perturbation. In this paper, we show that FTPL with a Fr'echet perturbation also enjoys the near optimal regret bound O(√nm(√dlog(d)+m5/6)) in the adversarial setting and approaches best-of-both-world regret bounds, i.e., achieves a logarithmic regret for the stochastic setting. Moreover, our lower bounds show that the extra factors are unavoidable with our approach; any improvement would require a fundamentally different and more challenging method.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.

Builds on

22 of 41 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  2. 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 91
  3. 2019Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Long-term User Engagement in Recommender Systemscited by 90
  4. 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
  5. 2015Cascading Bandits: Learning to Rank in the Cascade Modelcited by 75
  6. 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
  7. 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
  8. 2015Fighting Bandits with a New Kind of Smoothnesscited by 45
  9. 2013Thompson Sampling for Complex Bandit Problemscited by 43
  10. 2021The best of both worlds: stochastic and adversarial episodic MDPs with unknown transitioncited by 40
  11. 2014Matroid Bandits: Fast Combinatorial Optimization with Learningcited by 29
  12. 2015First-order regret bounds for combinatorial semi-banditscited by 25
10 more
  1. 2019Connections Between Mirror Descent, Thompson Sampling and the Information Ratiocited by 23
  2. 2018Efficient Online Portfolio with Logarithmic Regretcited by 20
  3. 2022Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader for Adversarial Markov Decision Processes with Bandit Feedbackcited by 16
  4. 2015Importance weighting without importance weights: An efficient algorithm for combinatorial semi-banditscited by 15
  5. 2023Best-of-Three-Worlds Linear Bandit Algorithm with Variance-Adaptive Regret Boundscited by 13
  6. 2023Best-of-three-worlds Analysis for Linear Bandits with Follow-the-regularized-leader Algorithmcited by 11
  7. 2019On the Optimality of Perturbations in Stochastic and Adversarial Multi-armed Bandit Problemscited by 10
  8. 2023Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Linear Contextual Banditscited by 10
  9. 2024Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader with Fr'echet-type Tail Distributions: Optimality in Adversarial Bandits and Best-of-Both-Worldscited by 9
  10. 2015Achieving All with No Parameters: Adaptive NormalHedgecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.