Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader Approaches Best-of-Both-Worlds for the m-Set Semi-Bandit Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a common case of the combinatorial semi-bandit problem, the m-set semi-bandit, where the learner exactly selects m arms from the total d arms. In the adversarial setting, the best regret bound, known to be O(√nmd) for time horizon n, is achieved by the well-known Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) policy. However, this requires to explicitly compute the arm-selection probabilities via optimizing problems at each time step and sample according to them. This problem can be avoided by the Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) policy, which simply pulls the m arms that rank among the m smallest (estimated) loss with random perturbation. In this paper, we show that FTPL with a Fr'echet perturbation also enjoys the near optimal regret bound O(√nm(√dlog(d)+m5/6)) in the adversarial setting and approaches best-of-both-world regret bounds, i.e., achieves a logarithmic regret for the stochastic setting. Moreover, our lower bounds show that the extra factors are unavoidable with our approach; any improvement would require a fundamentally different and more challenging method.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.
Builds on
22 of 41 references.
References · 22
- 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
- 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 91
- 2019Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Long-term User Engagement in Recommender Systemscited by 90
- 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
- 2015Cascading Bandits: Learning to Rank in the Cascade Modelcited by 75
- 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
- 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
- 2015Fighting Bandits with a New Kind of Smoothnesscited by 45
- 2013Thompson Sampling for Complex Bandit Problemscited by 43
- 2021The best of both worlds: stochastic and adversarial episodic MDPs with unknown transitioncited by 40
- 2014Matroid Bandits: Fast Combinatorial Optimization with Learningcited by 29
- 2015First-order regret bounds for combinatorial semi-banditscited by 25
10 more
- 2019Connections Between Mirror Descent, Thompson Sampling and the Information Ratiocited by 23
- 2018Efficient Online Portfolio with Logarithmic Regretcited by 20
- 2022Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader for Adversarial Markov Decision Processes with Bandit Feedbackcited by 16
- 2015Importance weighting without importance weights: An efficient algorithm for combinatorial semi-banditscited by 15
- 2023Best-of-Three-Worlds Linear Bandit Algorithm with Variance-Adaptive Regret Boundscited by 13
- 2023Best-of-three-worlds Analysis for Linear Bandits with Follow-the-regularized-leader Algorithmcited by 11
- 2019On the Optimality of Perturbations in Stochastic and Adversarial Multi-armed Bandit Problemscited by 10
- 2023Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Linear Contextual Banditscited by 10
- 2024Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader with Fr'echet-type Tail Distributions: Optimality in Adversarial Bandits and Best-of-Both-Worldscited by 9
- 2015Achieving All with No Parameters: Adaptive NormalHedgecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.