mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarially Robust Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithm with Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds

arXiv 2206.06810 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper considers the multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem and provides a new best-of-both-worlds (BOBW) algorithm that works nearly optimally in both stochastic and adversarial settings. In stochastic settings, some existing BOBW algorithms achieve tight gap-dependent regret bounds of O(sumi: Deltai>0 fraclog TDeltai) for suboptimality gap Deltai of arm i and time horizon T. As Audibert et al. [2007] have shown, however, that the performance can be improved in stochastic environments with low-variance arms. In fact, they have provided a stochastic MAB algorithm with gap-variance-dependent regret bounds of O(sumi: Deltai>0 (fracσi2Deltai + 1) log T ) for loss variance σi2 of arm i. In this paper, we propose the first BOBW algorithm with gap-variance-dependent bounds, showing that the variance information can be used even in the possibly adversarial environment. Further, the leading constant factor in our gap-variance dependent bound is only (almost) twice the value for the lower bound. Additionally, the proposed algorithm enjoys multiple data-dependent regret bounds in adversarial settings and works well in stochastic settings with adversarial corruptions. The proposed algorithm is based on the follow-the-regularized-leader method and employs adaptive learning rates that depend on the empirical prediction error of the loss, which leads to gap-variance-dependent regret bounds reflecting the variance of the arms.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2022.

Builds on

20 of 42 references.

References · 20

  1. 2013Optimization, Learning, and Games with Predictable Sequencescited by 188
  2. 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 124
  3. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  4. 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 95
  5. 2018What Doubling Tricks Can and Can't Do for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 71
  6. 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 70
  7. 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
  8. 2020Simultaneously Learning Stochastic and Adversarial Episodic MDPs with Known Transitioncited by 48
  9. 2021Achieving Near Instance-Optimality and Minimax-Optimality in Stochastic and Adversarial Linear Bandits Simultaneouslycited by 48
  10. 2016An algorithm with nearly optimal pseudo-regret for both stochastic and adversarial banditscited by 47
  11. 2017An Improved Parametrization and Analysis of the EXP3++ Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 43
  12. 2021The best of both worlds: stochastic and adversarial episodic MDPs with unknown transitioncited by 40
8 more
  1. 2018On the optimality of the Hedge algorithm in the stochastic regimecited by 33
  2. 2020Prediction with Corrupted Expert Advicecited by 27
  3. 2017Sparsity, variance and curvature in multi-armed banditscited by 24
  4. 2019Improved Path-length Regret Bounds for Banditscited by 23
  5. 2019Connections Between Mirror Descent, Thompson Sampling and the Information Ratiocited by 23
  6. 2021On Optimal Robustness to Adversarial Corruption in Online Decision Problemscited by 21
  7. 2021Improved Analysis of the Tsallis-INF Algorithm in Stochastically Constrained Adversarial Bandits and Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 15
  8. 2017Following the Leader and Fast Rates in Linear Prediction: Curved Constraint Sets and Other Regularitiescited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

12 papers.