Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation: From Linear to Nonlinear
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Function approximation has been an indispensable component in modern reinforcement learning algorithms designed to tackle problems with large state spaces in high dimensions. This paper reviews recent results on error analysis for these reinforcement learning algorithms in linear or nonlinear approximation settings, emphasizing approximation error and estimation error/sample complexity. We discuss various properties related to approximation error and present concrete conditions on transition probability and reward function under which these properties hold true. Sample complexity analysis in reinforcement learning is more complicated than in supervised learning, primarily due to the distribution mismatch phenomenon. With assumptions on the linear structure of the problem, numerous algorithms in the literature achieve polynomial sample complexity with respect to the number of features, episode length, and accuracy, although the minimax rate has not been achieved yet. These results rely on the L^∞ and UCB estimation of estimation error, which can handle the distribution mismatch phenomenon. The problem and analysis become substantially more challenging in the setting of nonlinear function approximation, as both L^∞ and UCB estimation are inadequate for bounding the error with a favorable rate in high dimensions. We discuss additional assumptions necessary to address the distribution mismatch and derive meaningful results for nonlinear RL problems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2023.
Builds on
35 of 63 references.
References · 35
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
- 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
23 more
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
- 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 203
- 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
- 2017Unifying PAC and Regret: Uniform PAC Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 175
- 2019Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergencecited by 157
- 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 136
- 2017On the Properties of the Softmax Function with Application in Game Theory and Reinforcement Learningcited by 136
- 2019Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Modelcited by 124
- 2019Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function Approximationcited by 111
- 2020Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Feature Mappingcited by 102
- 2020Towards a Mathematical Understanding of Neural Network-Based Machine Learning: what we know and what we don'tcited by 94
- 2020PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient Learningcited by 91
- 2017FALKON: An Optimal Large Scale Kernel Methodcited by 82
- 2018A Priori Estimates of the Population Risk for Two-layer Neural Networkscited by 76
- 2019A Comparative Analysis of the Optimization and Generalization Property of Two-layer Neural Network and Random Feature Models Under Gradient Descent Dynamicscited by 49
- 2019The Barron Space and the Flow-induced Function Spaces for Neural Network Modelscited by 39
- 2022Guarantees for Epsilon-Greedy Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximationcited by 29
- 2021Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Is Feasible for Linearly Realizable MDPs with Limited Revisitingcited by 27
- 2020Kolmogorov Width Decay and Poor Approximators in Machine Learning: Shallow Neural Networks, Random Feature Models and Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 19
- 2021Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Linearly-Parameterized MDPs with a Generative Modelcited by 18
- 2021An L2 Analysis of Reinforcement Learning in High Dimensions with Kernel and Neural Network Approximationcited by 13
- 2018When Simple Exploration is Sample Efficient: Identifying Sufficient Conditions for Random Exploration to Yield PAC RL Algorithmscited by 11
- 2021Perturbational Complexity by Distribution Mismatch: A Systematic Analysis of Reinforcement Learning in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Unified continuous-time q-learning for mean-field game and mean-field control problemscited by 7
- 2023Toward L_∞-recovery of Nonlinear Functions: A Polynomial Sample Complexity Bound for Gaussian Random Fieldscited by 4
- 2023Graph Exploration for Effective Multi-agent Q-Learningcited by 1
- 2023The L^∞ Learnability of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacescited by 0
- 2024Unified continuous-time q-learning for mean-field game and mean-field control problems5 Jul 2024
- 2023The L^∞ Learnability of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces5 Jun 2023
- 2023Toward L_∞-recovery of Nonlinear Functions: A Polynomial Sample Complexity Bound for Gaussian Random Fields29 Apr 2023
- 2023Graph Exploration for Effective Multi-agent Q-Learning19 Apr 2023