mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Perturbational Complexity by Distribution Mismatch: A Systematic Analysis of Reinforcement Learning in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space

arXiv 2111.03469 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2021cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing theoretical analysis of reinforcement learning (RL) is limited to the tabular setting or linear models due to the difficulty in dealing with function approximation in high dimensional space with an uncertain environment. This work offers a fresh perspective into this challenge by analyzing RL in a general reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). We consider a family of Markov decision processes M of which the reward functions lie in the unit ball of an RKHS and transition probabilities lie in a given arbitrary set. We define a quantity called perturbational complexity by distribution mismatch DeltaM(ε) to characterize the complexity of the admissible state-action distribution space in response to a perturbation in the RKHS with scale ε. We show that DeltaM(ε) gives both the lower bound of the error of all possible algorithms and the upper bound of two specific algorithms (fitted reward and fitted Q-iteration) for the RL problem. Hence, the decay of DeltaM(ε) with respect to ε measures the difficulty of the RL problem on M. We further provide some concrete examples and discuss whether DeltaM(ε) decays fast or not in these examples. As a byproduct, we show that when the reward functions lie in a high dimensional RKHS, even if the transition probability is known and the action space is finite, it is still possible for RL problems to suffer from the curse of dimensionality.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2021.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  2. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
  3. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
  4. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
  5. 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 287
  6. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 215
  7. 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 205
  8. 2017Unifying PAC and Regret: Uniform PAC Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 176
  9. 2019Is a Good Representation Sufficient for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning?cited by 140
  10. 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 138
  11. 2014Generalization and Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 112
  12. 2019Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function Approximationcited by 111
5 more
  1. 2019The Barron Space and the Flow-induced Function Spaces for Neural Network Modelscited by 39
  2. 2021Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Is Feasible for Linearly Realizable MDPs with Limited Revisitingcited by 28
  3. 2021Optimal policy evaluation using kernel-based temporal difference methodscited by 24
  4. 2021An L2 Analysis of Reinforcement Learning in High Dimensions with Kernel and Neural Network Approximationcited by 13
  5. 2019Learning to Control in Metric Space with Optimal Regretcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.