mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Few-Shot Generalization by Exploring and Exploiting Auxiliary Data

arXiv 2302.00674 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Few-shot learning is valuable in many real-world applications, but learning a generalizable model without overfitting to the few labeled datapoints is challenging. In this work, we focus on Few-shot Learning with Auxiliary Data (FLAD), a training paradigm that assumes access to auxiliary data during few-shot learning in hopes of improving generalization. Previous works have proposed automated methods for mixing auxiliary and target data, but these methods typically scale linearly (or worse) with the number of auxiliary datasets, limiting their practicality. In this work we relate FLAD to the explore-exploit dilemma that is central to the multi-armed bandit setting and derive algorithms whose computational complexity is independent of the number of auxiliary datasets, allowing us to scale to 100x more auxiliary datasets than prior methods. We propose two algorithms -- EXP3-FLAD and UCB1-FLAD -- and compare them with prior FLAD methods that either explore or exploit, finding that the combination of exploration and exploitation is crucial. Through extensive experimentation we find that our methods outperform all pre-existing FLAD methods by 4% and lead to the first 3 billion parameter language models that outperform the 175 billion parameter GPT-3. Overall, our work suggests that the discovery of better, more efficient mixing strategies for FLAD may provide a viable path towards substantially improving generalization in few-shot learning.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.

Builds on

44 of 77 references.

References · 44

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  5. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  6. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  7. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  8. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
  9. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
  10. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  11. 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 742
  12. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
32 more
  1. 2019Generalizing from a Few Examples: A Survey on Few-Shot Learningcited by 462
  2. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  3. 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 343
  4. 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 288
  5. 2017Automated Curriculum Learning for Neural Networkscited by 251
  6. 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 235
  7. 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 214
  8. 2013Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Indexcited by 193
  9. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
  10. 2020Gradient Vaccine: Investigating and Improving Multi-task Optimization in Massively Multilingual Modelscited by 167
  11. 2021ExT5: Towards Extreme Multi-Task Scaling for Transfer Learningcited by 161
  12. 2020Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Models for Natural Language Understanding: When and Why Does It Work?cited by 127
  13. 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 126
  14. 2020Understanding and Improving Information Transfer in Multi-Task Learningcited by 113
  15. 2018Adapting Auxiliary Losses Using Gradient Similaritycited by 98
  16. 2022Learning from Few Examples: A Summary of Approaches to Few-Shot Learningcited by 86
  17. 2020Self-Supervised Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Natural Language Classification Taskscited by 51
  18. 2020Auxiliary Learning by Implicit Differentiationcited by 45
  19. 2022Unsupervised Cross-Task Generalization via Retrieval Augmentationcited by 42
  20. 2021Should We Be Pre-training? An Argument for End-task Aware Training as an Alternativecited by 26
  21. 2022Metadata Archaeology: Unearthing Data Subsets by Leveraging Training Dynamicscited by 26
  22. 2022Data-Efficient Finetuning Using Cross-Task Nearest Neighborscited by 26
  23. 2018Dynamic Multi-Level Multi-Task Learning for Sentence Simplificationcited by 25
  24. 2021Weighted Training for Cross-Task Learningcited by 22
  25. 2016Neural Text Generation from Structured Data with Application to the Biography Domaincited by 20
  26. 2022AANG: Automating Auxiliary Learningcited by 12
  27. 2022FETA: A Benchmark for Few-Sample Task Transfer in Open-Domain Dialoguecited by 11
  28. 2021Prioritized training on points that are learnable, worth learning, and not yet learned (workshop version)cited by 7
  29. 2021Nonstationary Stochastic Multiarmed Bandits: UCB Policies and Minimax Regretcited by 6
  30. 2017Learning to Multi-Task by Active Samplingcited by 5
  31. 2020DORB: Dynamically Optimizing Multiple Rewards with Banditscited by 5
  32. 2020Extended Few-Shot Learning: Exploiting Existing Resources for Novel Taskscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: