mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FaithUn: Toward Faithful Forgetting in Language Models by Investigating the Interconnectedness of Knowledge

arXiv 2502.19207 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Various studies have attempted to remove sensitive or private knowledge from a language model to prevent its unauthorized exposure. However, prior studies have overlooked the complex and interconnected nature of knowledge, where related knowledge must be carefully examined. Specifically, they have failed to evaluate whether an unlearning method faithfully erases interconnected knowledge that should be removed, retaining knowledge that appears relevant but exists in a completely different context. To resolve this problem, we first define a new concept called superficial unlearning, which refers to the phenomenon where an unlearning method either fails to erase the interconnected knowledge it should remove or unintentionally erases irrelevant knowledge. Based on the definition, we introduce a new benchmark, FaithUn, to analyze and evaluate the faithfulness of unlearning in real-world knowledge QA settings. Furthermore, we propose a novel unlearning method, KLUE, which updates only knowledge-related neurons to achieve faithful unlearning. KLUE identifies knowledge neurons using an explainability method and updates only those neurons using selected unforgotten samples. Experimental results demonstrate that widely-used unlearning methods fail to ensure faithful unlearning, while our method shows significant effectiveness in real-world QA unlearning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
  2. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  3. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
  4. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  5. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  6. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct

Other references · 12

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  4. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  5. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  6. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  7. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
  8. 2023MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questionscited by 292
  9. 2023Large Language Models Can be Lazy Learners: Analyze Shortcuts in In-Context Learningcited by 69
  10. 2024Making Long-Context Language Models Better Multi-Hop Reasonerscited by 25
  11. 2023Improving Few-Shot Generalization by Exploring and Exploiting Auxiliary Datacited by 13
  12. 2022Task-specific Compression for Multi-task Language Models using Attribution-based Pruningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.

5 papers.