mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Forgetting: A New Mechanism Towards Better Large Language Model Fine-tuning

arXiv 2508.04329 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) plays a critical role for pretrained large language models (LLMs), notably enhancing their capacity to acquire domain-specific knowledge while preserving or potentially augmenting their general-purpose capabilities. However, the efficacy of SFT hinges on data quality as well as data volume, otherwise it may result in limited performance gains or even degradation relative to the associated baselines. To mitigate such reliance, we suggest categorizing tokens within each corpus into two parts -- positive and negative tokens -- based on whether they are useful to improve model performance. Positive tokens can be trained in common ways, whereas negative tokens, which may lack essential semantics or be misleading, should be explicitly forgotten. Overall, the token categorization facilitates the model to learn less informative messages, and the forgetting guides the model on what information to learn more precisely. We conduct experiments across diverse and well-established benchmarks using various model architectures, demonstrating that this forgetting mechanism enhances model performance.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 71 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

71 of 84 references.

References · 71

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  5. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  7. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  8. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  9. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  10. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  11. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  12. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
38 more
  1. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  2. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  3. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  4. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  6. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  7. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  8. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  9. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  10. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  11. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
  12. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  13. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
  14. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  15. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
  16. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 658
  17. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  18. 2021Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 553
  19. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 533
  20. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  21. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearningcited by 504
  22. 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 492
  23. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
  24. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 437
  25. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
  26. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 394
  27. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 381
  28. 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 318
  29. 2023Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 302
  30. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
  31. 2023A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicitycited by 182
  32. 2023Scaling Down to Scale Up: A Guide to Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 173
  33. 2021Challenges in Detoxifying Language Modelscited by 169
  34. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 135
  35. 2024Machine Unlearning of Pre-trained Large Language Modelscited by 119
  36. 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 109
  37. 2021What's in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpuscited by 80
  38. 2024RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 78

50 most cited of 71 All 71 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.