Neuro-Symbolic Spatio-Temporal Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge about space and time is necessary to solve problems in the physical world: An AI agent situated in the physical world and interacting with objects often needs to reason about positions of and relations between objects; and as soon as the agent plans its actions to solve a task, it needs to consider the temporal aspect (e.g., what actions to perform over time). Spatio-temporal knowledge, however, is required beyond interacting with the physical world, and is also often transferred to the abstract world of concepts through analogies and metaphors (e.g., "a threat that is hanging over our heads"). As spatial and temporal reasoning is ubiquitous, different attempts have been made to integrate this into AI systems. In the area of knowledge representation, spatial and temporal reasoning has been largely limited to modeling objects and relations and developing reasoning methods to verify statements about objects and relations. On the other hand, neural network researchers have tried to teach models to learn spatial relations from data with limited reasoning capabilities. Bridging the gap between these two approaches in a mutually beneficial way could allow us to tackle many complex real-world problems, such as natural language processing, visual question answering, and semantic image segmentation. In this chapter, we view this integration problem from the perspective of Neuro-Symbolic AI. Specifically, we propose a synergy between logical reasoning and machine learning that will be grounded on spatial and temporal knowledge. Describing some successful applications, remaining challenges, and evaluation datasets pertaining to this direction is the main topic of this contribution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2022.
Builds on
29 of 88 references.
References · 29
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 745
- 2018A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographscited by 459
- 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 372
- 2016Visual Relationship Detection with Language Priorscited by 334
- 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
- 201912-in-1: Multi-Task Vision and Language Representation Learningcited by 278
- 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 199
- 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
17 more
- 2016Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 123
- 2022Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problemscited by 110
- 2020From Statistical Relational to Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligencecited by 63
- 2019SpatialSense: An Adversarially Crowdsourced Benchmark for Spatial Relation Recognitioncited by 55
- 2021Modular Design Patterns for Hybrid Learning and Reasoning Systems: a taxonomy, patterns and use casescited by 39
- 2020Neuro-Symbolic Visual Reasoning: Disentangling "Visual" from "Reasoning"cited by 35
- 2021PTR: A Benchmark for Part-based Conceptual, Relational, and Physical Reasoningcited by 34
- 2020Rel3D: A Minimally Contrastive Benchmark for Grounding Spatial Relations in 3Dcited by 30
- 2020Commonsense Visual Sensemaking for Autonomous Driving: On Generalised Neurosymbolic Online Abduction Integrating Vision and Semanticscited by 15
- 2022Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Reportcited by 14
- 2022What is Right for Me is Not Yet Right for You: A Dataset for Grounding Relative Directions via Multi-Task Learningcited by 10
- 2019Out of Sight But Not Out of Mind: An Answer Set Programming Based Online Abduction Framework for Visual Sensemaking in Autonomous Drivingcited by 8
- 2020Visual Relationship Detection using Scene Graphs: A Surveycited by 8
- 2016Non-Monotonic Spatial Reasoning with Answer Set Programming Modulo Theoriescited by 6
- 2019Semantic Referee: A Neural-Symbolic Framework for Enhancing Geospatial Semantic Segmentationcited by 6
- 2019Allen's Interval Algebra Makes the Differencecited by 4
- 2020A Generalised Approach for Encoding and Reasoning with Qualitative Theories in Answer Set Programmingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Neuro-symbolic Training for Reasoning over Spatial Language
- 2026From Perception to Action: Spatial AI Agents and World Models
- 2025Around the World in 24 Hours: Probing LLM Knowledge of Time and Place
- 2024Can Large Language Models Reason about the Region Connection Calculus?
- 2026LASAR: Towards Spatio-temporal Reasoning with Latent Cognitive Map
- 2025Towards a Neurosymbolic Reasoning System Grounded in Schematic Representations
- 2026Linear Mechanisms for Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Vision Language Models
- 2025A Survey of Large Language Model-Powered Spatial Intelligence Across Scales: Advances in Embodied Agents, Smart Cities, and Earth Science