mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What is Right for Me is Not Yet Right for You: A Dataset for Grounding Relative Directions via Multi-Task Learning

arXiv 2205.02671 ↗First posted 5 May 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding spatial relations is essential for intelligent agents to act and communicate in the physical world. Relative directions are spatial relations that describe the relative positions of target objects with regard to the intrinsic orientation of reference objects. Grounding relative directions is more difficult than grounding absolute directions because it not only requires a model to detect objects in the image and to identify spatial relation based on this information, but it also needs to recognize the orientation of objects and integrate this information into the reasoning process. We investigate the challenging problem of grounding relative directions with end-to-end neural networks. To this end, we provide GRiD-3D, a novel dataset that features relative directions and complements existing visual question answering (VQA) datasets, such as CLEVR, that involve only absolute directions. We also provide baselines for the dataset with two established end-to-end VQA models. Experimental evaluations show that answering questions on relative directions is feasible when questions in the dataset simulate the necessary subtasks for grounding relative directions. We discover that those subtasks are learned in an order that reflects the steps of an intuitive pipeline for processing relative directions.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2022.

Builds on

14 of 24 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  2. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  3. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  4. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  5. 2018A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographscited by 457
  6. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
  7. 2020Just Ask: Learning to Answer Questions from Millions of Narrated Videoscited by 248
  8. 2018Compositional Attention Networks for Machine Reasoningcited by 183
  9. 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
  10. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  11. 2016Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 123
  12. 2019SpatialSense: An Adversarially Crowdsourced Benchmark for Spatial Relation Recognitioncited by 55
2 more
  1. 2021PTR: A Benchmark for Part-based Conceptual, Relational, and Physical Reasoningcited by 34
  2. 2020Rel3D: A Minimally Contrastive Benchmark for Grounding Spatial Relations in 3Dcited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Grounding Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Need Object Localization for Spatial Reasoning?
  2. 2026Who Is Left of Whom? Tracing Spatial Evidence and Role Binding in Relative-Position Reasoning
  3. 2025Spatial Understanding from Videos: Structured Prompts Meet Simulation Data
  4. 2024Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Exploring Spatial Language Grounding Through Referring Expressions
  6. 2025Pursuing Minimal Sufficiency in Spatial Reasoning
  7. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities
  8. 2026SpatialCORE: Confidence-Aware Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision--Language Models