Neuro-symbolic Training for Reasoning over Spatial Language
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Spatial reasoning based on natural language expressions is essential for everyday human tasks. This reasoning ability is also crucial for machines to interact with their environment in a human-like manner. However, recent research shows that even state-of-the-art language models struggle with spatial reasoning over text, especially when facing nesting spatial expressions. This is attributed to not achieving the right level of abstraction required for generalizability. To alleviate this issue, we propose training language models with neuro-symbolic techniques that exploit the spatial logical rules as constraints, providing additional supervision to improve spatial reasoning and question answering. Training language models to adhere to spatial reasoning rules guides them in making more effective and general abstractions for transferring spatial knowledge to various domains. We evaluate our approach on existing spatial question-answering benchmarks. Our results indicate the effectiveness of our proposed technique in improving language models in complex multi-hop spatial reasoning over text.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 3 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.
Builds on
3 of 46 references.
References · 3
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
- 2022Reasoning over Logically Interacted Conditions for Question Answeringcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference Under Ambiguitiescited by 58
- 2024SPARTUN3D: Situated Spatial Understanding of 3D World in Large Language Modelscited by 26
- 2025Scaling and Beyond: Advancing Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs Requires New Recipescited by 22
- 2026Spatial Reasoning via Modality Switching Between Language and Symbolic Representationscited by 0
- 2026Spatial Reasoning via Modality Switching Between Language and Symbolic Representations30 Jun 2026
- 2025Scaling and Beyond: Advancing Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs Requires New Recipes21 Apr 2025
- 2024Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference Under Ambiguities22 Oct 2024
- 2024SPARTUN3D: Situated Spatial Understanding of 3D World in Large Language Models4 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022StepGame: A New Benchmark for Robust Multi-Hop Spatial Reasoning in Texts
- 2024Dspy-based Neural-Symbolic Pipeline to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in LLMs
- 2024Advancing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models: An In-Depth Evaluation and Enhancement Using the StepGame Benchmark
- 2025Stuck in the Matrix: Probing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2026From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2023Disentangling Extraction and Reasoning in Multi-hop Spatial Reasoning
- 2025FoREST: Frame of Reference Evaluation in Spatial Reasoning Tasks
- 2024SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models