mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Agent-Specific Deontic Modality Detection in Legal Language

arXiv 2211.12752 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Legal documents are typically long and written in legalese, which makes it particularly difficult for laypeople to understand their rights and duties. While natural language understanding technologies can be valuable in supporting such understanding in the legal domain, the limited availability of datasets annotated for deontic modalities in the legal domain, due to the cost of hiring experts and privacy issues, is a bottleneck. To this end, we introduce, LEXDEMOD, a corpus of English contracts annotated with deontic modality expressed with respect to a contracting party or agent along with the modal triggers. We benchmark this dataset on two tasks: (i) agent-specific multi-label deontic modality classification, and (ii) agent-specific deontic modality and trigger span detection using Transformer-based (Vaswani et al., 2017) language models. Transfer learning experiments show that the linguistic diversity of modal expressions in LEXDEMOD generalizes reasonably from lease to employment and rental agreements. A small case study indicates that a model trained on LEXDEMOD can detect red flags with high recall. We believe our work offers a new research direction for deontic modality detection in the legal domain.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2022.

Builds on

17 of 66 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 467
  5. 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 232
  6. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 208
  7. 2019JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Datasetcited by 115
  8. 2017Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basiscited by 61
  9. 2019Charge-Based Prison Term Prediction with Deep Gating Networkcited by 31
  10. 2019Plain English Summarization of Contractscited by 28
  11. 2018LexNLP: Natural language processing and information extraction for legal and regulatory textscited by 27
  12. 2019CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehensioncited by 26
5 more
  1. 2020A Benchmark for Lease Contract Reviewcited by 26
  2. 2018Obligation and Prohibition Extraction Using Hierarchical RNNscited by 18
  3. 2021The Possible, the Plausible, and the Desirable: Event-Based Modality Detection for Language Processingcited by 13
  4. 2020Severing the Edge Between Before and After: Neural Architectures for Temporal Ordering of Eventscited by 12
  5. 2022Entailment Relation Aware Paraphrase Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ContractScrub: A benchmark for final review of legal contracts
  2. 2026LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challenges
  3. 2026Retrieval-Augmented Detection of Potentially Abusive Clauses in Chilean Terms of Service
  4. 2025EU-Agent-Bench: Measuring Illegal Behavior of LLM Agents Under EU Law
  5. 2026A Few Good Clauses: Comparing LLMs vs Domain-Trained Small Language Models on Structured Contract Extraction
  6. 2023One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support
  7. 2026From Norms to Indicators (N2I-RAG): An Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Legal Indicator Computation
  8. 2026Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learning