Computational Identification of Regulatory Statements in EU Legislation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying regulatory statements in legislation is useful for developing metrics to measure the regulatory density and strictness of legislation. A computational method is valuable for scaling the identification of such statements from a growing body of EU legislation, constituting approximately 180,000 published legal acts between 1952 and 2023. Past work on extraction of these statements varies in the permissiveness of their definitions for what constitutes a regulatory statement. In this work, we provide a specific definition for our purposes based on the institutional grammar tool. We develop and compare two contrasting approaches for automatically identifying such statements in EU legislation, one based on dependency parsing, and the other on a transformer-based machine learning model. We found both approaches performed similarly well with accuracies of 80% and 84% respectively and a K alpha of 0.58. The high accuracies and not exceedingly high agreement suggests potential for combining strengths of both approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2025.
Builds on
15 of 39 references.
References · 15
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,067
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 546
- 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 73
- 2022Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Lawcited by 39
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.