A Survey of Classification Tasks and Approaches for Legal Contracts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given the large size and volumes of contracts and their underlying inherent complexity, manual reviews become inefficient and prone to errors, creating a clear need for automation. Automatic Legal Contract Classification (LCC) revolutionizes the way legal contracts are analyzed, offering substantial improvements in speed, accuracy, and accessibility. This survey delves into the challenges of automatic LCC and a detailed examination of key tasks, datasets, and methodologies. We identify seven classification tasks within LCC, and review fourteen datasets related to English-language contracts, including public, proprietary, and non-public sources. We also introduce a methodology taxonomy for LCC, categorized into Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Transformer-based approaches. Additionally, the survey discusses evaluation techniques and highlights the best-performing results from the reviewed studies. By providing a thorough overview of current methods and their limitations, this survey suggests future research directions to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and scalability of LCC. As the first comprehensive survey on LCC, it aims to support legal NLP researchers and practitioners in improving legal processes, making legal information more accessible, and promoting a more informed and equitable society.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.
Builds on
23 of 50 references.
References · 23
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
- 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in Englishcited by 310
- 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 201
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Small Language Models in the Era of Large Language Models: Techniques, Enhancements, Applications, Collaboration with LLMs, and Trustworthinesscited by 127
- 2020LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law Schoolcited by 111
- 2024LLaMA Pro: Progressive LLaMA with Block Expansioncited by 101
- 2021Paragraph-level Rationale Extraction through Regularization: A case study on European Court of Human Rights Casescited by 77
- 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 73
- 2023LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domaincited by 68
- 2023MultiLegalPile: A 689GB Multilingual Legal Corpuscited by 60
11 more
- 2023Metacognitive Prompting Improves Understanding in Large Language Modelscited by 58
- 2023LeXFiles and LegalLAMA: Facilitating English Multinational Legal Language Model Developmentcited by 54
- 2024Fast Vocabulary Transfer for Language Model Compressioncited by 42
- 2022Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Lawcited by 39
- 2023ChatGPT may Pass the Bar Exam soon, but has a Long Way to Go for the LexGLUE benchmarkcited by 33
- 2021LeSICiN: A Heterogeneous Graph-based Approach for Automatic Legal Statute Identification from Indian Legal Documentscited by 23
- 2024Multi-word Tokenization for Sequence Compressioncited by 17
- 2022Task Compass: Scaling Multi-task Pre-training with Task Prefixcited by 14
- 2023DALE: Generative Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Legal NLPcited by 12
- 2022Agent-Specific Deontic Modality Detection in Legal Languagecited by 7
- 2023Linear Classifier: An Often-Forgotten Baseline for Text Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Evaluating Customized vs. Generalist Transformer-based Models for Legal Contract Classificationcited by 2
- 2026When Routine Chats Turn Toxic: Unintended Long-Term State Poisoning in Personalized Agentscited by 1
- 2026Towards Intelligent Legal Document Analysis: CNN-Driven Classification of Case Law Textscited by 0
- 2026LAUKIN: A Multi-jurisdictional Common Law Contract Datasetcited by 0
- 2026ContraVis: Evidence-Grounded Visual Analytics for Contradiction Review in Legal Contractscited by 0
- 2026LAURA: Knowledge Distillation for Interpretable Ambiguous Clause Identification in Legal Contractscited by 0
- 2026LAURA: Knowledge Distillation for Interpretable Ambiguous Clause Identification in Legal Contracts29 Sep 2026
- 2026ContraVis: Evidence-Grounded Visual Analytics for Contradiction Review in Legal Contracts22 Sep 2026
- 2026LAUKIN: A Multi-jurisdictional Common Law Contract Dataset11 Jun 2026
- 2026When Routine Chats Turn Toxic: Unintended Long-Term State Poisoning in Personalized Agents7 May 2026
- 2026Towards Intelligent Legal Document Analysis: CNN-Driven Classification of Case Law Texts20 Apr 2026
- 2025Evaluating Customized vs. Generalist Transformer-based Models for Legal Contract Classification11 Aug 2025