mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integrative Feature and Cost Aggregation with Transformers for Dense Correspondence

arXiv 2209.08742 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2022cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a novel architecture for dense correspondence. The current state-of-the-art are Transformer-based approaches that focus on either feature descriptors or cost volume aggregation. However, they generally aggregate one or the other but not both, though joint aggregation would boost each other by providing information that one has but other lacks, i.e., structural or semantic information of an image, or pixel-wise matching similarity. In this work, we propose a novel Transformer-based network that interleaves both forms of aggregations in a way that exploits their complementary information. Specifically, we design a self-attention layer that leverages the descriptor to disambiguate the noisy cost volume and that also utilizes the cost volume to aggregate features in a manner that promotes accurate matching. A subsequent cross-attention layer performs further aggregation conditioned on the descriptors of both images and aided by the aggregated outputs of earlier layers. We further boost the performance with hierarchical processing, in which coarser level aggregations guide those at finer levels. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method on dense matching tasks and achieve state-of-the-art performance on all the major benchmarks. Extensive ablation studies are also provided to validate our design choices.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.

Builds on

54 of 80 references.

References · 54

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  7. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
  8. 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,474
  9. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  10. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
  11. 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,059
  12. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
38 more
  1. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 968
  2. 2021GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matchingcited by 327
  3. 2019D2-Net: A Trainable CNN for Joint Detection and Description of Local Featurescited by 326
  4. 2016LIFT: Learned Invariant Feature Transformcited by 306
  5. 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 275
  6. 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
  7. 2019R2D2: Repeatable and Reliable Detector and Descriptorcited by 207
  8. 2021COTR: Correspondence Transformer for Matching Across Imagescited by 183
  9. 2018Neighbourhood Consensus Networkscited by 174
  10. 2018LF-Net: Learning Local Features from Imagescited by 151
  11. 2019SPair-71k: A Large-scale Benchmark for Semantic Correspondencecited by 146
  12. 2019GLU-Net: Global-Local Universal Network for Dense Flow and Correspondencescited by 139
  13. 2017Convolutional neural network architecture for geometric matchingcited by 138
  14. 2021SOFT: Softmax-free Transformer with Linear Complexitycited by 128
  15. 2022Cost Aggregation with 4D Convolutional Swin Transformer for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 114
  16. 2021Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Themcited by 113
  17. 2020Efficient Neighbourhood Consensus Networks via Submanifold Sparse Convolutionscited by 93
  18. 2021CATs: Cost Aggregation Transformers for Visual Correspondencecited by 77
  19. 2015Unsupervised Object Discovery and Localization in the Wild: Part-based Matching with Bottom-up Region Proposalscited by 69
  20. 2018DGC-Net: Dense Geometric Correspondence Networkcited by 67
  21. 2021GAN-Supervised Dense Visual Alignmentcited by 62
  22. 2021Fastformer: Additive Attention Can Be All You Needcited by 61
  23. 2017End-to-end weakly-supervised semantic alignmentcited by 60
  24. 2019SFNet: Learning Object-aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 60
  25. 2015Proposal Flowcited by 57
  26. 2019Hyperpixel Flow: Semantic Correspondence with Multi-layer Neural Featurescited by 56
  27. 2020Learning to Compose Hypercolumns for Visual Correspondencecited by 53
  28. 2020GOCor: Bringing Globally Optimized Correspondence Volumes into Your Neural Networkcited by 53
  29. 2022CATs++: Boosting Cost Aggregation with Convolutions and Transformerscited by 53
  30. 2020RANSAC-Flow: generic two-stage image alignmentcited by 48
  31. 2017Proposal Flow: Semantic Correspondences from Object Proposalscited by 47
  32. 2019Dynamic Context Correspondence Network for Semantic Alignmentcited by 43
  33. 2020Correspondence Networks with Adaptive Neighbourhood Consensuscited by 42
  34. 2022DIP: Deep Inverse Patchmatch for High-Resolution Optical Flowcited by 40
  35. 2018Recurrent Transformer Networks for Semantic Correspondencecited by 32
  36. 2021Multi-scale Matching Networks for Semantic Correspondencecited by 32
  37. 2018Attentive Semantic Alignment with Offset-Aware Correlation Kernelscited by 31
  38. 2021Deep Matching Prior: Test-Time Optimization for Dense Correspondencecited by 30

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.