mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Compose Hypercolumns for Visual Correspondence

arXiv 2007.10587 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2020cs.CVcited by 53

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature representation plays a crucial role in visual correspondence, and recent methods for image matching resort to deeply stacked convolutional layers. These models, however, are both monolithic and static in the sense that they typically use a specific level of features, e.g., the output of the last layer, and adhere to it regardless of the images to match. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to visual correspondence that dynamically composes effective features by leveraging relevant layers conditioned on the images to match. Inspired by both multi-layer feature composition in object detection and adaptive inference architectures in classification, the proposed method, dubbed Dynamic Hyperpixel Flow, learns to compose hypercolumn features on the fly by selecting a small number of relevant layers from a deep convolutional neural network. We demonstrate the effectiveness on the task of semantic correspondence, i.e., establishing correspondences between images depicting different instances of the same object or scene category. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that the proposed method greatly improves matching performance over the state of the art in an adaptive and efficient manner.

Key facts. Cited by 53 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 15; 2022: 12; 2023: 11; 2024: 7; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

53 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Emergent Correspondence from Image Diffusioncited by 437
  2. 2023Diffusion Hyperfeatures: Searching Through Time and Space for Semantic Correspondencecited by 211
  3. 2021Hypercorrelation Squeeze for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 193
  4. 2022Cost Aggregation with 4D Convolutional Swin Transformer for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 114
  5. 2023Telling Left from Right: Identifying Geometry-Aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 85
  6. 2021PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Networkcited by 80
  7. 2021CATs: Cost Aggregation Transformers for Visual Correspondencecited by 77
  8. 2021Relational Embedding for Few-Shot Classificationcited by 74
  9. 2021GAN-Supervised Dense Visual Alignmentcited by 61
  10. 2021DiscoBox: Weakly Supervised Instance Segmentation and Semantic Correspondence from Box Supervisioncited by 59
  11. 2022CATs++: Boosting Cost Aggregation with Convolutions and Transformerscited by 53
  12. 2021Convolutional Hough Matching Networkscited by 43
38 more
  1. 2021Warp Consistency for Unsupervised Learning of Dense Correspondencescited by 42
  2. 2023SD4Match: Learning to Prompt Stable Diffusion Model for Semantic Matchingcited by 38
  3. 2023Improving Semantic Correspondence with Viewpoint-Guided Spherical Mapscited by 33
  4. 2021Multi-scale Matching Networks for Semantic Correspondencecited by 32
  5. 2022Neural Matching Fields: Implicit Representation of Matching Fields for Visual Correspondencecited by 32
  6. 2022Learning Semantic Correspondence with Sparse Annotationscited by 31
  7. 2021Deep Matching Prior: Test-Time Optimization for Dense Correspondencecited by 30
  8. 2022Probabilistic Warp Consistency for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Correspondencescited by 30
  9. 2023Neural Congealing: Aligning Images to a Joint Semantic Atlascited by 30
  10. 2022TransforMatcher: Match-to-Match Attention for Semantic Correspondencecited by 29
  11. 2022Self-Supervised Equivariant Learning for Oriented Keypoint Detectioncited by 26
  12. 2024Not All Diffusion Model Activations Have Been Evaluated as Discriminative Featurescited by 23
  13. 2022MSANet: Multi-Similarity and Attention Guidance for Boosting Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 21
  14. 2024Autogenic Language Embedding for Coherent Point Trackingcited by 17
  15. 2024Distillation of Diffusion Features for Semantic Correspondencecited by 17
  16. 2021Cost Aggregation Is All You Need for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 16
  17. 2022Semi-Supervised Learning of Semantic Correspondence with Pseudo-Labelscited by 16
  18. 2024Unifying Feature and Cost Aggregation with Transformers for Semantic and Visual Correspondencecited by 14
  19. 2025Hierarchical Neural Semantic Representation for 3D Semantic Correspondencecited by 14
  20. 2022Semantic-Aware Fine-Grained Correspondencecited by 13
  21. 2021Convolutional Hough Matching Networks for Robust and Efficient Visual Correspondencecited by 12
  22. 2021Learning Contrastive Representation for Semantic Correspondencecited by 11
  23. 2023Quaternion-valued Correlation Learning for Few-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 10
  24. 2022Demystifying Unsupervised Semantic Correspondence Estimationcited by 9
  25. 2025RIPE: Reinforcement Learning on Unlabeled Image Pairs for Robust Keypoint Extractioncited by 9
  26. 2022Integrative Feature and Cost Aggregation with Transformers for Dense Correspondencecited by 6
  27. 2023SimSC: A Simple Framework for Semantic Correspondence with Temperature Learningcited by 6
  28. 2023Efficient Semantic Matching with Hypercolumn Correlationcited by 6
  29. 2025Jamais Vu: Exposing the Generalization Gap in Supervised Semantic Correspondencecited by 5
  30. 2025Fine-Grained Image-Text Correspondence with Cost Aggregation for Open-Vocabulary Part Segmentationcited by 4
  31. 2025Semantic Correspondence: Unified Benchmarking and a Strong Baselinecited by 3
  32. 2021Understanding Pixel-level 2D Image Semantics with 3D Keypoint Knowledge Enginecited by 2
  33. 2023Match me if you can: Semi-Supervised Semantic Correspondence Learning with Unpaired Imagescited by 2
  34. 2024Independently Keypoint Learning for Small Object Semantic Correspondencecited by 2
  35. 2024Suppress Content Shift: Better Diffusion Features via Off-the-Shelf Generation Techniquescited by 2
  36. 2025Similarity-Aware Selective State-Space Modeling for Semantic Correspondencecited by 1
  37. 2021HoughCL: Finding Better Positive Pairs in Dense Self-supervised Learningcited by 0
  38. 2023Learning Space-Time Semantic Correspondencescited by 0

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)