mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Proposal Flow: Semantic Correspondences from Object Proposals

arXiv 1703.07144 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2017cs.CVcited by 46

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Finding image correspondences remains a challenging problem in the presence of intra-class variations and large changes in scene layout. Semantic flow methods are designed to handle images depicting different instances of the same object or scene category. We introduce a novel approach to semantic flow, dubbed proposal flow, that establishes reliable correspondences using object proposals. Unlike prevailing semantic flow approaches that operate on pixels or regularly sampled local regions, proposal flow benefits from the characteristics of modern object proposals, that exhibit high repeatability at multiple scales, and can take advantage of both local and geometric consistency constraints among proposals. We also show that the corresponding sparse proposal flow can effectively be transformed into a conventional dense flow field. We introduce two new challenging datasets that can be used to evaluate both general semantic flow techniques and region-based approaches such as proposal flow. We use these benchmarks to compare different matching algorithms, object proposals, and region features within proposal flow, to the state of the art in semantic flow. This comparison, along with experiments on standard datasets, demonstrates that proposal flow significantly outperforms existing semantic flow methods in various settings.

Key facts. Cited by 46 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 11; 2023: 9; 2024: 5; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.

46 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Emergent Correspondence from Image Diffusioncited by 437
  2. 2023Diffusion Hyperfeatures: Searching Through Time and Space for Semantic Correspondencecited by 211
  3. 2021Hypercorrelation Squeeze for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 193
  4. 2023Unsupervised Semantic Correspondence Using Stable Diffusioncited by 120
  5. 2022Cost Aggregation with 4D Convolutional Swin Transformer for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 114
  6. 2023Telling Left from Right: Identifying Geometry-Aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 85
  7. 2021CATs: Cost Aggregation Transformers for Visual Correspondencecited by 77
  8. 2021DiscoBox: Weakly Supervised Instance Segmentation and Semantic Correspondence from Box Supervisioncited by 59
  9. 2022CATs++: Boosting Cost Aggregation with Convolutions and Transformerscited by 53
  10. 2021Convolutional Hough Matching Networkscited by 43
  11. 2021Warp Consistency for Unsupervised Learning of Dense Correspondencescited by 42
  12. 2023SD4Match: Learning to Prompt Stable Diffusion Model for Semantic Matchingcited by 38
34 more
  1. 2022Neural Matching Fields: Implicit Representation of Matching Fields for Visual Correspondencecited by 32
  2. 2022Learning Semantic Correspondence with Sparse Annotationscited by 31
  3. 2021Deep Matching Prior: Test-Time Optimization for Dense Correspondencecited by 30
  4. 2022Probabilistic Warp Consistency for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Correspondencescited by 30
  5. 2022TransforMatcher: Match-to-Match Attention for Semantic Correspondencecited by 29
  6. 2023ASIC: Aligning Sparse in-the-wild Image Collectionscited by 26
  7. 2022Virtual Correspondence: Humans as a Cue for Extreme-View Geometrycited by 25
  8. 2023Diffusion Model for Dense Matchingcited by 21
  9. 2024Distillation of Diffusion Features for Semantic Correspondencecited by 17
  10. 2021Cost Aggregation Is All You Need for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 16
  11. 2024Unifying Feature and Cost Aggregation with Transformers for Semantic and Visual Correspondencecited by 14
  12. 2021Convolutional Hough Matching Networks for Robust and Efficient Visual Correspondencecited by 12
  13. 2025MATCHA:Towards Matching Anythingcited by 12
  14. 2021Learning Contrastive Representation for Semantic Correspondencecited by 11
  15. 2024SHIC: Shape-Image Correspondences with no Keypoint Supervisioncited by 11
  16. 2022Demystifying Unsupervised Semantic Correspondence Estimationcited by 9
  17. 2022Integrative Feature and Cost Aggregation with Transformers for Dense Correspondencecited by 6
  18. 2023SimSC: A Simple Framework for Semantic Correspondence with Temperature Learningcited by 6
  19. 2025GECO: Geometrically Consistent Embedding with Lightspeed Inferencecited by 6
  20. 20253D-Aware Vision-Language Models Fine-Tuning with Geometric Distillationcited by 4
  21. 2025Semantic Correspondence: Unified Benchmarking and a Strong Baselinecited by 3
  22. 2026MARCO: Navigating the Unseen Space of Semantic Correspondencecited by 3
  23. 2021Understanding Pixel-level 2D Image Semantics with 3D Keypoint Knowledge Enginecited by 2
  24. 2022Object-Guided Day-Night Visual Localization in Urban Scenescited by 2
  25. 2024Independently Keypoint Learning for Small Object Semantic Correspondencecited by 2
  26. 2021Hierarchical Image Peeling: A Flexible Scale-space Filtering Frameworkcited by 1
  27. 2022Image Keypoint Matching using Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
  28. 2025Similarity-Aware Selective State-Space Modeling for Semantic Correspondencecited by 1
  29. 2026Geometry Matters: 3D Foundation Priors for Learning Semantic Correspondencecited by 1
  30. 2023Learning Space-Time Semantic Correspondencescited by 0
  31. 2024Matching Semantically Similar Non-Identical Objectscited by 0
  32. 2025Towards Robust Semantic Correspondence: A Benchmark and Insightscited by 0
  33. 2026SimpleMatch: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Semantic Correspondencecited by 0
  34. 2026Category-Level 3D Correspondence in Camera Space via Morphable Object Priorscited by 0