mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning Driven Natural Languages Text to SQL Query Conversion: A Survey

arXiv 2208.04415 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the future striving toward data-centric decision-making, seamless access to databases is of utmost importance. There is extensive research on creating an efficient text-to-sql (TEXT2SQL) model to access data from the database. Using a Natural language is one of the best interfaces that can bridge the gap between the data and results by accessing the database efficiently, especially for non-technical users. It will open the doors and create tremendous interest among users who are well versed in technical skills or not very skilled in query languages. Even if numerous deep learning-based algorithms are proposed or studied, there still is very challenging to have a generic model to solve the data query issues using natural language in a real-work scenario. The reason is the use of different datasets in different studies, which comes with its limitations and assumptions. At the same time, we do lack a thorough understanding of these proposed models and their limitations with the specific dataset it is trained on. In this paper, we try to present a holistic overview of 24 recent neural network models studied in the last couple of years, including their architectures involving convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, pointer networks, reinforcement learning, generative models, etc. We also give an overview of the 11 datasets that are widely used to train the models for TEXT2SQL technologies. We also discuss the future application possibilities of TEXT2SQL technologies for seamless data queries.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2022.

Builds on

39 of 72 references.

References · 39

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  6. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  7. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  8. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 882
  9. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  10. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  11. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
  12. 2019Towards Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representationcited by 210
27 more
  1. 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 180
  2. 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
  3. 2016Language to Logical Form with Neural Attentioncited by 158
  4. 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 141
  5. 2017SQLNet: Generating Structured Queries From Natural Language Without Reinforcement Learningcited by 135
  6. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  7. 2020Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 133
  8. 2018Large-Scale Learnable Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 113
  9. 2017Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedbackcited by 98
  10. 2018TypeSQL: Knowledge-based Type-Aware Neural Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 81
  11. 2018SyntaxSQLNet: Syntax Tree Networks for Complex and Cross-DomainText-to-SQL Taskcited by 74
  12. 2019Representing Schema Structure with Graph Neural Networks for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 74
  13. 2020RYANSQL: Recursively Applying Sketch-based Slot Fillings for Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Databasescited by 63
  14. 2018Robust Text-to-SQL Generation with Execution-Guided Decodingcited by 51
  15. 2021Text-to-SQL in the Wild: A Naturally-Occurring Dataset Based on Stack Exchange Datacited by 43
  16. 2021Learning to Synthesize Data for Semantic Parsingcited by 41
  17. 2019Model-based Interactive Semantic Parsing: A Unified Framework and A Text-to-SQL Case Studycited by 40
  18. 2019A Pilot Study for Chinese SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 33
  19. 2021Awakening Latent Grounding from Pretrained Language Models for Semantic Parsingcited by 28
  20. 2021SeaD: End-to-end Text-to-SQL Generation with Schema-aware Denoisingcited by 27
  21. 2019Content Enhanced BERT-based Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 16
  22. 2020Did You Ask a Good Question? A Cross-Domain Question Intention Classification Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 16
  23. 2019Zero-shot Text-to-SQL Learning with Auxiliary Taskcited by 10
  24. 2019Encoding Database Schemas with Relation-Aware Self-Attention for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 4
  25. 2019Visual Multi-Metric Grouping of Eye-Tracking Datacited by 4
  26. 2020A Tale of Two Linkings: Dynamically Gating between Schema Linking and Structural Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 4
  27. 2020Recent Advances in SQL Query Generation: A Surveycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

11 papers.