mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Zero-shot Text-to-SQL Learning with Auxiliary Task

arXiv 1908.11052 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2019cs.CL cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent years have seen great success in the use of neural seq2seq models on the text-to-SQL task. However, little work has paid attention to how these models generalize to realistic unseen data, which naturally raises a question: does this impressive performance signify a perfect generalization model, or are there still some limitations? In this paper, we first diagnose the bottleneck of text-to-SQL task by providing a new testbed, in which we observe that existing models present poor generalization ability on rarely-seen data. The above analysis encourages us to design a simple but effective auxiliary task, which serves as a supportive model as well as a regularization term to the generation task to increase the models generalization. Experimentally, We evaluate our models on a large text-to-SQL dataset WikiSQL. Compared to a strong baseline coarse-to-fine model, our models improve over the baseline by more than 3% absolute in accuracy on the whole dataset. More interestingly, on a zero-shot subset test of WikiSQL, our models achieve 5% absolute accuracy gain over the baseline, clearly demonstrating its superior generalizability.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

10 papers.