mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Supervised Velocity Estimation for Automotive Radar Object Detection Networks

arXiv 2207.03146 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a method to learn the Cartesian velocity of objects using an object detection network on automotive radar data. The proposed method is self-supervised in terms of generating its own training signal for the velocities. Labels are only required for single-frame, oriented bounding boxes (OBBs). Labels for the Cartesian velocities or contiguous sequences, which are expensive to obtain, are not required. The general idea is to pre-train an object detection network without velocities using single-frame OBB labels, and then exploit the network's OBB predictions on unlabelled data for velocity training. In detail, the network's OBB predictions of the unlabelled frames are updated to the timestamp of a labelled frame using the predicted velocities and the distances between the updated OBBs of the unlabelled frame and the OBB predictions of the labelled frame are used to generate a self-supervised training signal for the velocities. The detection network architecture is extended by a module to account for the temporal relation of multiple scans and a module to represent the radars' radial velocity measurements explicitly. A two-step approach of first training only OBB detection, followed by training OBB detection and velocities is used. Further, a pre-training with pseudo-labels generated from radar radial velocity measurements bootstraps the self-supervised method of this paper. Experiments on the publicly available nuScenes dataset show that the proposed method almost reaches the velocity estimation performance of a fully supervised training, but does not require expensive velocity labels. Furthermore, we outperform a baseline method which uses only radial velocity measurements as labels.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.

Builds on

21 of 42 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  4. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  5. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  6. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  7. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  8. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  9. 2019PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 358
  10. 2020Fast and Furious: Real Time End-to-End 3D Detection, Tracking and Motion Forecasting with a Single Convolutional Netcited by 228
  11. 2020CenterFusion: Center-based Radar and Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 159
  12. 2020RadarNet: Exploiting Radar for Robust Perception of Dynamic Objectscited by 48
9 more
  1. 2020CNN based Road User Detection using the 3D Radar Cubecited by 47
  2. 20192D Car Detection in Radar Data with PointNetscited by 38
  3. 2021Multi-View Radar Semantic Segmentationcited by 34
  4. 2019Deep Radar Detectorcited by 22
  5. 2022Pointillism: Accurate 3D bounding box estimation with multi-radarscited by 22
  6. 2021Radar Voxel Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 13
  7. 2020Off-the-shelf sensor vs. experimental radar -- How much resolution is necessary in automotive radar classification?cited by 10
  8. 2020DeepReflecs: Deep Learning for Automotive Object Classification with Radar Reflectionscited by 9
  9. 2020Deep Learning on Radar Centric 3D Object Detectioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3.

5 papers.