Off-the-shelf sensor vs. experimental radar -- How much resolution is necessary in automotive radar classification?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Radar-based road user detection is an important topic in the context of autonomous driving applications. The resolution of conventional automotive radar sensors results in a sparse data representation which is tough to refine during subsequent signal processing. On the other hand, a new sensor generation is waiting in the wings for its application in this challenging field. In this article, two sensors of different radar generations are evaluated against each other. The evaluation criterion is the performance on moving road user object detection and classification tasks. To this end, two data sets originating from an off-the-shelf radar and a high resolution next generation radar are compared. Special attention is given on how the two data sets are assembled in order to make them comparable. The utilized object detector consists of a clustering algorithm, a feature extraction module, and a recurrent neural network ensemble for classification. For the assessment, all components are evaluated both individually and, for the first time, as a whole. This allows for indicating where overall performance improvements have their origin in the pipeline. Furthermore, the generalization capabilities of both data sets are evaluated and important comparison metrics for automotive radar object detection are discussed. Results show clear benefits of the next generation radar. Interestingly, those benefits do not actually occur due to better performance at the classification stage, but rather because of the vast improvements at the clustering stage.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 3.
10 papers.
- 2021RadarScenes: A Real-World Radar Point Cloud Data Set for Automotive Applicationscited by 61
- 2023SMURF: Spatial Multi-Representation Fusion for 3D Object Detection with 4D Imaging Radarcited by 48
- 2022Improved Orientation Estimation and Detection with Hybrid Object Detection Networks for Automotive Radarcited by 33
- 2021Deep Instance Segmentation with Automotive Radar Detection Pointscited by 22
- 2023Exploring Radar Data Representations in Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 22
- 2021Radar Voxel Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 13
- 2022A recurrent CNN for online object detection on raw radar framescited by 9
- 2022Self-Supervised Velocity Estimation for Automotive Radar Object Detection Networkscited by 5
- 2023RC-BEVFusion: A Plug-In Module for Radar-Camera Bird's Eye View Feature Fusioncited by 2
- 2022Online Learning-based Waveform Selection for Improved Vehicle Recognition in Automotive Radarcited by 0
- 2023Exploring Radar Data Representations in Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Review8 Dec 2023
- 2023SMURF: Spatial Multi-Representation Fusion for 3D Object Detection with 4D Imaging Radar20 Jul 2023
- 2023RC-BEVFusion: A Plug-In Module for Radar-Camera Bird's Eye View Feature Fusion25 May 2023
- 2022A recurrent CNN for online object detection on raw radar frames21 Dec 2022
- 2022Online Learning-based Waveform Selection for Improved Vehicle Recognition in Automotive Radar1 Dec 2022
- 2022Self-Supervised Velocity Estimation for Automotive Radar Object Detection Networks7 Jul 2022
- 2022Improved Orientation Estimation and Detection with Hybrid Object Detection Networks for Automotive Radar3 May 2022
- 2021Deep Instance Segmentation with Automotive Radar Detection Points5 Oct 2021
- 2021Radar Voxel Fusion for 3D Object Detection26 Jun 2021
- 2021RadarScenes: A Real-World Radar Point Cloud Data Set for Automotive Applications6 Apr 2021