Choosing Answers in varepsilon-Best-Answer Identification for Linear Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In pure-exploration problems, information is gathered sequentially to answer a question on the stochastic environment. While best-arm identification for linear bandits has been extensively studied in recent years, few works have been dedicated to identifying one arm that is varepsilon-close to the best one (and not exactly the best one). In this problem with several correct answers, an identification algorithm should focus on one candidate among those answers and verify that it is correct. We demonstrate that picking the answer with highest mean does not allow an algorithm to reach asymptotic optimality in terms of expected sample complexity. Instead, a textitfurthest answer should be identified. Using that insight to choose the candidate answer carefully, we develop a simple procedure to adapt best-arm identification algorithms to tackle varepsilon-best-answer identification in transductive linear stochastic bandits. Finally, we propose an asymptotically optimal algorithm for this setting, which is shown to achieve competitive empirical performance against existing modified best-arm identification algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2022.
Builds on
26 of 53 references.
References · 26
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 98
- 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
- 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
- 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
- 2016An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problemcited by 62
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
- 2020Gamification of Pure Exploration for Linear Banditscited by 61
- 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 60
- 2020An Empirical Process Approach to the Union Bound: Practical Algorithms for Combinatorial and Linear Banditscited by 45
- 2017Fully adaptive algorithm for pure exploration in linear banditscited by 43
14 more
- 2019The True Sample Complexity of Identifying Good Armscited by 37
- 2020Improved Confidence Bounds for the Linear Logistic Model and Applications to Linear Banditscited by 31
- 2016Towards Instance Optimal Bounds for Best Arm Identificationcited by 30
- 2020Review on Ranking and Selection: A New Perspectivecited by 28
- 2020An Asymptotically Optimal Primal-Dual Incremental Algorithm for Contextual Linear Banditscited by 26
- 2020Structure Adaptive Algorithms for Stochastic Banditscited by 19
- 2021Efficient Pure Exploration for Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-Bandit Feedbackcited by 19
- 2018Sequential Test for the Lowest Mean: From Thompson to Murphy Samplingcited by 14
- 2021Top-m identification for linear banditscited by 11
- 2021Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identificationcited by 11
- 2020Explicit Best Arm Identification in Linear Bandits Using No-Regret Learnerscited by 6
- 2022On the complexity of All varepsilon-Best Arms Identificationcited by 6
- 2021Problem Dependent View on Structured Thresholding Bandit Problemscited by 5
- 2021Pure Exploration and Regret Minimization in Matching Banditscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Top Two Algorithms Revisitedcited by 34
- 2022Top Two Algorithms Revisited13 Jun 2022