mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identification

arXiv 2111.01479 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2021cs.AI cs.LG math.STcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of the identification of m arms with largest means under a fixed error rate δ (fixed-confidence Top-m identification), for misspecified linear bandit models. This problem is motivated by practical applications, especially in medicine and recommendation systems, where linear models are popular due to their simplicity and the existence of efficient algorithms, but in which data inevitably deviates from linearity. In this work, we first derive a tractable lower bound on the sample complexity of any δ-correct algorithm for the general Top-m identification problem. We show that knowing the scale of the deviation from linearity is necessary to exploit the structure of the problem. We then describe the first algorithm for this setting, which is both practical and adapts to the amount of misspecification. We derive an upper bound to its sample complexity which confirms this adaptivity and that matches the lower bound when δ rightarrow 0. Finally, we evaluate our algorithm on both synthetic and real-world data, showing competitive performance with respect to existing baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2021.

Builds on

30 of 46 references.

References · 30

  1. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  2. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  3. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
  4. 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
  5. 2019Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Modelcited by 124
  6. 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 98
  7. 2019Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Banditscited by 88
  8. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
  9. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
  10. 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
  11. 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
  12. 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
18 more
  1. 2020Gamification of Pure Exploration for Linear Banditscited by 61
  2. 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 60
  3. 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
  4. 2020An Empirical Process Approach to the Union Bound: Practical Algorithms for Combinatorial and Linear Banditscited by 45
  5. 2017Fully adaptive algorithm for pure exploration in linear banditscited by 43
  6. 2017Misspecified Linear Banditscited by 41
  7. 2019Fixed-Confidence Guarantees for Bayesian Best-Arm Identificationcited by 38
  8. 2019The True Sample Complexity of Identifying Good Armscited by 37
  9. 2020Asymptotically Optimal Information-Directed Samplingcited by 33
  10. 2017The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regimecited by 31
  11. 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
  12. 2017Nearly Instance Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Top-k Arm Selectioncited by 28
  13. 2019OSOM: A simultaneously optimal algorithm for multi-armed and linear contextual banditscited by 28
  14. 2020An Asymptotically Optimal Primal-Dual Incremental Algorithm for Contextual Linear Banditscited by 26
  15. 2020Structure Adaptive Algorithms for Stochastic Banditscited by 19
  16. 2020Experimental Design for Regret Minimization in Linear Banditscited by 11
  17. 2021Top-m identification for linear banditscited by 11
  18. 2020Explicit Best Arm Identification in Linear Bandits Using No-Regret Learnerscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

11 papers.