Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of the identification of m arms with largest means under a fixed error rate δ (fixed-confidence Top-m identification), for misspecified linear bandit models. This problem is motivated by practical applications, especially in medicine and recommendation systems, where linear models are popular due to their simplicity and the existence of efficient algorithms, but in which data inevitably deviates from linearity. In this work, we first derive a tractable lower bound on the sample complexity of any δ-correct algorithm for the general Top-m identification problem. We show that knowing the scale of the deviation from linearity is necessary to exploit the structure of the problem. We then describe the first algorithm for this setting, which is both practical and adapts to the amount of misspecification. We derive an upper bound to its sample complexity which confirms this adaptivity and that matches the lower bound when δ rightarrow 0. Finally, we evaluate our algorithm on both synthetic and real-world data, showing competitive performance with respect to existing baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2021.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
References · 30
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
- 2019Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Modelcited by 124
- 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 98
- 2019Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Banditscited by 88
- 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
- 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
- 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
- 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
18 more
- 2020Gamification of Pure Exploration for Linear Banditscited by 61
- 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 60
- 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
- 2020An Empirical Process Approach to the Union Bound: Practical Algorithms for Combinatorial and Linear Banditscited by 45
- 2017Fully adaptive algorithm for pure exploration in linear banditscited by 43
- 2017Misspecified Linear Banditscited by 41
- 2019Fixed-Confidence Guarantees for Bayesian Best-Arm Identificationcited by 38
- 2019The True Sample Complexity of Identifying Good Armscited by 37
- 2020Asymptotically Optimal Information-Directed Samplingcited by 33
- 2017The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regimecited by 31
- 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
- 2017Nearly Instance Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Top-k Arm Selectioncited by 28
- 2019OSOM: A simultaneously optimal algorithm for multi-armed and linear contextual banditscited by 28
- 2020An Asymptotically Optimal Primal-Dual Incremental Algorithm for Contextual Linear Banditscited by 26
- 2020Structure Adaptive Algorithms for Stochastic Banditscited by 19
- 2020Experimental Design for Regret Minimization in Linear Banditscited by 11
- 2021Top-m identification for linear banditscited by 11
- 2020Explicit Best Arm Identification in Linear Bandits Using No-Regret Learnerscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Banditscited by 18
- 2022Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedbackcited by 15
- 2022Information-Directed Selection for Top-Two Algorithmscited by 15
- 2022On Elimination Strategies for Bandit Fixed-Confidence Identificationcited by 8
- 2023Active Coverage for PAC Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2022On the Complexity of Representation Learning in Contextual Linear Banditscited by 2
- 2025Constrained Pareto Set Identification with Bandit Feedbackcited by 2
- 2022Choosing Answers in varepsilon-Best-Answer Identification for Linear Banditscited by 1
- 2026Best-Arm Identification with Generative Proxycited by 1
- 2023Optimal Regret Bounds for Collaborative Learning in Banditscited by 0
- 2026Almost Asymptotically Optimal Active Clustering Through Pairwise Observationscited by 0
- 2026Best-Arm Identification with Generative Proxy8 Jul 2026
- 2026Almost Asymptotically Optimal Active Clustering Through Pairwise Observations5 Feb 2026
- 2025Constrained Pareto Set Identification with Bandit Feedback9 Jun 2025
- 2023Optimal Regret Bounds for Collaborative Learning in Bandits15 Dec 2023
- 2023Active Coverage for PAC Reinforcement Learning23 Jun 2023
- 2022On the Complexity of Representation Learning in Contextual Linear Bandits19 Dec 2022
- 2022Choosing Answers in varepsilon-Best-Answer Identification for Linear Bandits9 Jun 2022
- 2022Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Bandits31 May 2022
- 2022Information-Directed Selection for Top-Two Algorithms24 May 2022
- 2022On Elimination Strategies for Bandit Fixed-Confidence Identification22 May 2022
- 2022Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedback9 Feb 2022