On the complexity of All varepsilon-Best Arms Identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the question introduced by citeMason2020 of identifying all the varepsilon-optimal arms in a finite stochastic multi-armed bandit with Gaussian rewards. We give two lower bounds on the sample complexity of any algorithm solving the problem with a confidence at least 1-δ. The first, unimprovable in the asymptotic regime, motivates the design of a Track-and-Stop strategy whose average sample complexity is asymptotically optimal when the risk δ goes to zero. Notably, we provide an efficient numerical method to solve the convex max-min program that appears in the lower bound. Our method is based on a complete characterization of the alternative bandit instances that the optimal sampling strategy needs to rule out, thus making our bound tighter than the one provided by citeMason2020. The second lower bound deals with the regime of high and moderate values of the risk δ, and characterizes the behavior of any algorithm in the initial phase. It emphasizes the linear dependency of the sample complexity in the number of arms. Finally, we report on numerical simulations demonstrating our algorithm's advantage over state-of-the-art methods, even for moderate risks.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2022.
Builds on
10 of 21 references.
References · 10
- 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
- 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
- 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
- 2017The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regimecited by 31
- 2021Efficient Pure Exploration for Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-Bandit Feedbackcited by 19
- 2019Gradient Ascent for Active Exploration in Bandit Problemscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Non-Asymptotic Analysis of a UCB-based Top Two Algorithmcited by 11
- 2022Asymptotic Instance-Optimal Algorithms for Interactive Decision Makingcited by 7
- 2024Best-Arm Identification in Unimodal Banditscited by 6
- 2022Choosing Answers in varepsilon-Best-Answer Identification for Linear Banditscited by 1
- 2025Non-Asymptotic Analysis of (Sticky) Track-and-Stopcited by 0
- 2026Cost-Ordered Feasibility for Multi-Armed Bandits with Cost Subsidycited by 0
- 2026Cost-Ordered Feasibility for Multi-Armed Bandits with Cost Subsidy8 May 2026
- 2025Non-Asymptotic Analysis of (Sticky) Track-and-Stop28 May 2025
- 2024Best-Arm Identification in Unimodal Bandits4 Nov 2024
- 2022Non-Asymptotic Analysis of a UCB-based Top Two Algorithm11 Oct 2022
- 2022Choosing Answers in varepsilon-Best-Answer Identification for Linear Bandits9 Jun 2022
- 2022Asymptotic Instance-Optimal Algorithms for Interactive Decision Making6 Jun 2022