mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

KOLD: Korean Offensive Language Dataset

arXiv 2205.11315 ↗First posted 23 May 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent directions for offensive language detection are hierarchical modeling, identifying the type and the target of offensive language, and interpretability with offensive span annotation and prediction. These improvements are focused on English and do not transfer well to other languages because of cultural and linguistic differences. In this paper, we present the Korean Offensive Language Dataset (KOLD) comprising 40,429 comments, which are annotated hierarchically with the type and the target of offensive language, accompanied by annotations of the corresponding text spans. We collect the comments from NAVER news and YouTube platform and provide the titles of the articles and videos as the context information for the annotation process. We use these annotated comments as training data for Korean BERT and RoBERTa models and find that they are effective at offensiveness detection, target classification, and target span detection while having room for improvement for target group classification and offensive span detection. We discover that the target group distribution differs drastically from the existing English datasets, and observe that providing the context information improves the model performance in offensiveness detection (+0.3), target classification (+1.5), and target group classification (+13.1). We publicly release the dataset and baseline models.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2022.

Builds on

36 of 69 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  4. 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 789
  5. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  6. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  7. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
  8. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  9. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
  10. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  11. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
  12. 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 258
24 more
  1. 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 216
  2. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  3. 2018Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forumcited by 196
  4. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 139
  5. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
  6. 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
  7. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 130
  8. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 115
  9. 2021KLUE: Korean Language Understanding Evaluationcited by 113
  10. 2020Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?cited by 93
  11. 2020OCNLI: Original Chinese Natural Language Inferencecited by 86
  12. 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
  13. 2017Detecting Online Hate Speech Using Context Aware Modelscited by 72
  14. 2020ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Datasetcited by 66
  15. 2018All You Need is "Love": Evading Hate-speech Detectioncited by 56
  16. 2020SOLID: A Large-Scale Semi-Supervised Dataset for Offensive Language Identificationcited by 53
  17. 2020BEEP! Korean Corpus of Online News Comments for Toxic Speech Detectioncited by 39
  18. 2018Hate Speech Detection: A Solved Problem? The Challenging Case of Long Tail on Twittercited by 36
  19. 2021MUDES: Multilingual Detection of Offensive Spanscited by 30
  20. 2020Arabic Offensive Language on Twitter: Analysis and Experimentscited by 28
  21. 2021Lifelong Learning of Hate Speech Classification on Social Mediacited by 14
  22. 2021Predicting Anti-Asian Hateful Users on Twitter during COVID-19cited by 11
  23. 2022Korean Online Hate Speech Dataset for Multilabel Classification: How Can Social Science Improve Dataset on Hate Speech?cited by 6
  24. 2021Investigating Transfer Learning in Multilingual Pre-trained Language Models through Chinese Natural Language Inferencecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: