mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BEADs: Bias Evaluation Across Domains

arXiv 2406.04220 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have substantially improved natural language processing (NLP) applications. However, these models often inherit and amplify biases present in their training data. Although several datasets exist for bias detection, most are limited to one or two NLP tasks, typically classification or evaluation and do not provide broad coverage across diverse task settings. To address this gap, we introduce the Bias Evaluations Across Domains (BtextttEADs) dataset, designed to support a wide range of NLP tasks, including text classification, token classification, bias quantification, and benign language generation. A key contribution of this work is a gold-standard annotation scheme that supports both evaluation and supervised training of language models. Experiments on state-of-the-art models reveal some gaps: some models exhibit systematic bias toward specific demographics, while others apply safety guardrails more strictly or inconsistently across groups. Overall, these results highlight persistent shortcomings in current models and underscore the need for comprehensive bias evaluation. Project: https://vectorinstitute.github.io/BEAD/ Data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/shainar/BEAD

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.

Builds on

62 of 92 references.

References · 62

  1. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  2. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  3. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  5. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  6. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  7. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  8. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  9. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  10. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  11. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  12. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
38 more
  1. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  2. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
  3. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  4. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  5. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
  6. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  7. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
  8. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
  9. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  10. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
  11. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
  12. 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
  13. 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
  14. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 294
  15. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  16. 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 254
  17. 2023Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Pretrained Language Models: A Critical Review and Assessmentcited by 227
  18. 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 222
  19. 2018Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forumcited by 196
  20. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 196
  21. 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 170
  22. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  23. 2022"I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Datasetcited by 160
  24. 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
  25. 2019Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluationcited by 148
  26. 2022Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instancescited by 110
  27. 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 107
  28. 2019It's All in the Name: Mitigating Gender Bias with Name-Based Counterfactual Data Substitutioncited by 102
  29. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Studycited by 96
  30. 2023LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotatorscited by 78
  31. 2019In Plain Sight: Media Bias Through the Lens of Factual Reportingcited by 68
  32. 2023ROBBIE: Robust Bias Evaluation of Large Generative Language Modelscited by 53
  33. 2022Perturbation Augmentation for Fairer NLPcited by 51
  34. 2021Hatemoji: A Test Suite and Adversarially-Generated Dataset for Benchmarking and Detecting Emoji-based Hatecited by 50
  35. 2024MEGAnno+: A Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation Systemcited by 47
  36. 2023WinoQueer: A Community-in-the-Loop Benchmark for Anti-LGBTQ+ Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 42
  37. 2022Generalizing to the Future: Mitigating Entity Bias in Fake News Detectioncited by 38
  38. 2019Man is to Person as Woman is to Location: Measuring Gender Bias in Named Entity Recognitioncited by 28

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.