SafeNet: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Ensembles in Private Collaborative Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Secure multiparty computation (MPC) has been proposed to allow multiple mutually distrustful data owners to jointly train machine learning (ML) models on their combined data. However, by design, MPC protocols faithfully compute the training functionality, which the adversarial ML community has shown to leak private information and can be tampered with in poisoning attacks. In this work, we argue that model ensembles, implemented in our framework called SafeNet, are a highly MPC-amenable way to avoid many adversarial ML attacks. The natural partitioning of data amongst owners in MPC training allows this approach to be highly scalable at training time, provide provable protection from poisoning attacks, and provably defense against a number of privacy attacks. We demonstrate SafeNet's efficiency, accuracy, and resilience to poisoning on several machine learning datasets and models trained in end-to-end and transfer learning scenarios. For instance, SafeNet reduces backdoor attack success significantly, while achieving 39× faster training and 36 × less communication than the four-party MPC framework of Dalskov et al. Our experiments show that ensembling retains these benefits even in many non-iid settings. The simplicity, cheap setup, and robustness properties of ensembling make it a strong first choice for training ML models privately in MPC.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.
Builds on
53 of 103 references.
References · 53
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,328
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,273
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,729
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,336
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,047
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 872
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 846
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 764
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 708
- 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 579
38 more
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 562
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 490
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 481
- 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 451
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 339
- 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 268
- 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 224
- 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 196
- 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 161
- 2017Neural Trojanscited by 153
- 2019Fall of Empires: Breaking Byzantine-tolerant SGD by Inner Product Manipulationcited by 139
- 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 133
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
- 2020Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attackscited by 115
- 2022Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secretscited by 101
- 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 94
- 2020CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-Party Secure Inferencecited by 82
- 2018Technical Report: When Does Machine Learning FAIL? Generalized Transferability for Evasion and Poisoning Attackscited by 80
- 2022DeepSight: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning Through Deep Model Inspectioncited by 80
- 2020FALCON: Honest-Majority Maliciously Secure Framework for Private Deep Learningcited by 74
- 2015The Ladder: A Reliable Leaderboard for Machine Learning Competitionscited by 68
- 2021Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecturecited by 66
- 2021Provably Secure Federated Learning against Malicious Clientscited by 63
- 2019CrypTFlow: Secure TensorFlow Inferencecited by 61
- 2021Property Inference From Poisoningcited by 60
- 2022Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Machine Learning Modelscited by 57
- 2020Leakage of Dataset Properties in Multi-Party Machine Learningcited by 47
- 2021Formalizing and Estimating Distribution Inference Riskscited by 43
- 2021CaPC Learning: Confidential and Private Collaborative Learningcited by 33
- 2018Defending Against Saddle Point Attack in Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learningcited by 32
- 2019Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential Privacycited by 28
- 2022Privacy-Preserving Aggregation in Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 27
- 2019Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocolscited by 26
- 2019Trident: Efficient 4PC Framework for Privacy Preserving Machine Learningcited by 26
- 2019Secure Evaluation of Quantized Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2020Two-Phase Multi-Party Computation Enabled Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 19
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3.
5 papers.
- 2023Backdoor Attacks in Peer-to-Peer Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2024UTrace: Poisoning Forensics for Private Collaborative Learningcited by 3
- 2023WW-FL: Secure and Private Large-Scale Federated Learningcited by 2
- 2024Which PPML Would a User Choose? A Structured Decision Support Framework for Developers to Rank PPML Techniques Based on User Acceptance Criteriacited by 0
- 2024A cautionary tale on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative AI in real-world medical applicationscited by 0
- 2024A cautionary tale on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative AI in real-world medical applications9 Dec 2024
- 2024Which PPML Would a User Choose? A Structured Decision Support Framework for Developers to Rank PPML Techniques Based on User Acceptance Criteria11 Nov 2024
- 2024UTrace: Poisoning Forensics for Private Collaborative Learning23 Sep 2024
- 2023WW-FL: Secure and Private Large-Scale Federated Learning20 Feb 2023
- 2023Backdoor Attacks in Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning23 Jan 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Differentially Private and Adversarially Robust Machine Learning: An Empirical Evaluation
- 2021PRICURE: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Inference in a Multi-Party Setting
- 2023SecurityNet: Assessing Machine Learning Vulnerabilities on Public Models
- 2021SAFELearning: Enable Backdoor Detectability In Federated Learning With Secure Aggregation
- 2021Secure Quantized Training for Deep Learning
- 2023Machine Learning needs Better Randomness Standards: Randomised Smoothing and PRNG-based attacks
- 2022Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Learning through Feature Extraction
- 2021On Provable Backdoor Defense in Collaborative Learning