mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data

arXiv 1610.05755 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2016stat.ML cs.CR cs.LGcited by 347

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 24 in LLM safety and security, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

Some machine learning applications involve training data that is sensitive, such as the medical histories of patients in a clinical trial. A model may inadvertently and implicitly store some of its training data; careful analysis of the model may therefore reveal sensitive information. To address this problem, we demonstrate a generally applicable approach to providing strong privacy guarantees for training data: Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE). The approach combines, in a black-box fashion, multiple models trained with disjoint datasets, such as records from different subsets of users. Because they rely directly on sensitive data, these models are not published, but instead used as "teachers" for a "student" model. The student learns to predict an output chosen by noisy voting among all of the teachers, and cannot directly access an individual teacher or the underlying data or parameters. The student's privacy properties can be understood both intuitively (since no single teacher and thus no single dataset dictates the student's training) and formally, in terms of differential privacy. These properties hold even if an adversary can not only query the student but also inspect its internal workings. Compared with previous work, the approach imposes only weak assumptions on how teachers are trained: it applies to any model, including non-convex models like DNNs. We achieve state-of-the-art privacy/utility trade-offs on MNIST and SVHN thanks to an improved privacy analysis and semi-supervised learning.

Key facts. Cited by 347 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 57; 2022: 84; 2023: 86; 2024: 56; 2025: 37; 2026: 26.

347 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 405
  2. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
  3. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
  4. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
  5. 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
  6. 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 126
  7. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainabilitycited by 118
  8. 2022Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training Examplescited by 118
  9. 2021Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacycited by 113
  10. 2023Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generationcited by 94
  11. 2022Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectorycited by 93
  12. 2021Large Scale Private Learning via Low-rank Reparametrizationcited by 87
38 more
  1. 2021Do Not Let Privacy Overbill Utility: Gradient Embedding Perturbation for Private Learningcited by 86
  2. 2022Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challengescited by 81
  3. 2023Flocks of Stochastic Parrots: Differentially Private Prompt Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 80
  4. 2021ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 79
  5. 2022CTAB-GAN+: Enhancing Tabular Data Synthesiscited by 70
  6. 2022Synthetic Data -- what, why and how?cited by 66
  7. 2022FedDM: Iterative Distribution Matching for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 65
  8. 2021Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecturecited by 63
  9. 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directionscited by 58
  10. 2021Decentralized Federated Learning through Proxy Model Sharingcited by 56
  11. 2024Fairness Feedback Loops: Training on Synthetic Data Amplifies Biascited by 55
  12. 2021Don't Generate Me: Training Differentially Private Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencecited by 54
  13. 2022Mixed Differential Privacy in Computer Visioncited by 53
  14. 2022Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised Deep Visual Learning: A Surveycited by 52
  15. 2022Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clippingcited by 52
  16. 2021Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBIcited by 50
  17. 2022Improved Certified Defenses against Data Poisoning with (Deterministic) Finite Aggregationcited by 50
  18. 2021Public Data-Assisted Mirror Descent for Private Model Trainingcited by 49
  19. 2021Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic Datacited by 48
  20. 2023Privacy in Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Future Directionscited by 48
  21. 2022GAP: Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks with Aggregation Perturbationcited by 46
  22. 2021Differentially Private Federated Knowledge Graphs Embeddingcited by 45
  23. 2022Preserving Privacy in Federated Learning with Ensemble Cross-Domain Knowledge Distillationcited by 45
  24. 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
  25. 2021Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Neural Networkscited by 43
  26. 2024Privacy-Preserving Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Differential Privacycited by 38
  27. 2023SoK: Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesiscited by 37
  28. 2021Emerging Trends in Federated Learning: From Model Fusion to Federated X Learningcited by 35
  29. 2022RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utilitycited by 35
  30. 2024Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are Misleadingcited by 35
  31. 2022Private Set Generation with Discriminative Informationcited by 34
  32. 2021CaPC Learning: Confidential and Private Collaborative Learningcited by 33
  33. 2021DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?cited by 32
  34. 2021Releasing Graph Neural Networks with Differential Privacy Guaranteescited by 32
  35. 2022Just Fine-tune Twice: Selective Differential Privacy for Large Language Modelscited by 32
  36. 2021DataLens: Scalable Privacy Preserving Training via Gradient Compression and Aggregationcited by 31
  37. 2022Submix: Practical Private Prediction for Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 31
  38. 2022Bayesian Estimation of Differential Privacycited by 31

50 most cited of 347 All 347 (JSON)