mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Two-Phase Multi-Party Computation Enabled Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning

arXiv 2005.11901 ↗First posted 25 May 2020cs.DCcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Countries across the globe have been pushing strict regulations on the protection of personal or private data collected. The traditional centralized machine learning method, where data is collected from end-users or IoT devices, so that it can discover insights behind real-world data, may not be feasible for many data-driven industry applications in light of such regulations. A new machine learning method, coined by Google as Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple participants to train a machine learning model collectively without directly exchanging data. However, recent studies have shown that there is still a possibility to exploit the shared models to extract personal or confidential data. In this paper, we propose to adopt Multi Party Computation (MPC) to achieve privacy-preserving model aggregation for FL. The MPC-enabled model aggregation in a peer-to-peer manner incurs high communication overhead with low scalability. To address this problem, the authors proposed to develop a two-phase mechanism by 1) electing a small committee and 2) providing MPC-enabled model aggregation service to a larger number of participants through the committee. The MPC enabled FL framework has been integrated in an IoT platform for smart manufacturing. It enables a set of companies to train high quality models collectively by leveraging their complementary data-sets on their own premises, without compromising privacy, model accuracy vis-a-vis traditional machine learning methods and execution efficiency in terms of communication cost and execution time.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Federated Learning with Sparsified Model Perturbation: Improving Accuracy under Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 32
  2. 2021Fusion of Federated Learning and Industrial Internet of Things: A Surveycited by 28
  3. 2023Federated Learning for Computer Visioncited by 22
  4. 2023Over-The-Air Federated Learning: Status Quo, Open Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 21
  5. 2023Balancing Privacy Protection and Interpretability in Federated Learningcited by 6
  6. 2023When Federated Learning meets Watermarking: A Comprehensive Overview of Techniques for Intellectual Property Protectioncited by 6
  7. 2022SafeNet: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Ensembles in Private Collaborative Learningcited by 5
  8. 2024A Reality check of the benefits of LLM in businesscited by 5
  9. 2023Topology-Based Reconstruction Prevention for Decentralised Learningcited by 4
  10. 2022FedDCT: Federated Learning of Large Convolutional Neural Networks on Resource Constrained Devices using Divide and Collaborative Trainingcited by 3
  11. 2023Federated Learning: A Cutting-Edge Survey of the Latest Advancements and Applicationscited by 3
  12. 2024Is merging worth it? Securely evaluating the information gain for causal dataset acquisitioncited by 2
7 more
  1. 2022SPRITE: A Scalable Privacy-Preserving and Verifiable Collaborative Learning for Industrial IoTcited by 1
  2. 2023User Assignment and Resource Allocation for Hierarchical Federated Learning over Wireless Networkscited by 1
  3. 2024Privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learningcited by 1
  4. 2024Security and Privacy Issues and Solutions in Federated Learning for Digital Healthcarecited by 0
  5. 2025Secure and Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Next-Generation Underground Mine Safetycited by 0
  6. 2026Privacy-Preserving and Verifiable Approximate Distributed Coded Computingcited by 0
  7. 2026When Topology Betrays Privacy: Lattice-Based Reconstruction Attacks on Secure Aggregation in Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 0