mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SAFELearning: Enable Backdoor Detectability In Federated Learning With Secure Aggregation

arXiv 2102.02402 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2021cs.CR cs.AI cs.DCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For model privacy, local model parameters in federated learning shall be obfuscated before sent to the remote aggregator. This technique is referred to as secure aggregation. However, secure aggregation makes model poisoning attacks such backdooring more convenient considering that existing anomaly detection methods mostly require access to plaintext local models. This paper proposes SAFELearning which supports backdoor detection for secure aggregation. We achieve this through two new primitives - oblivious random grouping (ORG) and partial parameter disclosure (PPD). ORG partitions participants into one-time random subgroups with group configurations oblivious to participants; PPD allows secure partial disclosure of aggregated subgroup models for anomaly detection without leaking individual model privacy. SAFELearning can significantly reduce backdoor model accuracy without jeopardizing the main task accuracy under common backdoor strategies. Extensive experiments show SAFELearning is robust against malicious and faulty participants, whilst being more efficient than the state-of-art secure aggregation protocol in terms of both communication and computation costs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2021.

Builds on

26 of 60 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  5. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  6. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  7. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  8. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  9. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  10. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  11. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
  12. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
14 more
  1. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
  2. 2015Deep Learning with Limited Numerical Precisioncited by 368
  3. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
  4. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
  5. 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
  6. 2018Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inferencecited by 193
  7. 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 158
  8. 2018Generalized Byzantine-tolerant SGDcited by 94
  9. 2018Privacy Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutionscited by 78
  10. 2018DRACO: Byzantine-resilient Distributed Training via Redundant Gradientscited by 74
  11. 2019Byzantine-Robust Federated Machine Learning through Adaptive Model Averagingcited by 70
  12. 2018Chameleon: A Hybrid Secure Computation Framework for Machine Learning Applicationscited by 67
  13. 2020Robust Aggregation for Adaptive Privacy Preserving Federated Learning in Healthcarecited by 18
  14. 2020Mitigating Sybil Attacks on Differential Privacy based Federated Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.