mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reward Reports for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2204.10817 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Building systems that are good for society in the face of complex societal effects requires a dynamic approach. Recent approaches to machine learning (ML) documentation have demonstrated the promise of discursive frameworks for deliberation about these complexities. However, these developments have been grounded in a static ML paradigm, leaving the role of feedback and post-deployment performance unexamined. Meanwhile, recent work in reinforcement learning has shown that the effects of feedback and optimization objectives on system behavior can be wide-ranging and unpredictable. In this paper we sketch a framework for documenting deployed and iteratively updated learning systems, which we call Reward Reports. Taking inspiration from various contributions to the technical literature on reinforcement learning, we outline Reward Reports as living documents that track updates to design choices and assumptions behind what a particular automated system is optimizing for. They are intended to track dynamic phenomena arising from system deployment, rather than merely static properties of models or data. After presenting the elements of a Reward Report, we discuss a concrete example: Meta's BlenderBot 3 chatbot. Several others for game-playing (DeepMind's MuZero), content recommendation (MovieLens), and traffic control (Project Flow) are included in the appendix.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2022.

Builds on

30 of 108 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  3. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  4. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  5. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
  6. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  7. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  8. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 754
  9. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  10. 2020The Pushshift Reddit Datasetcited by 292
  11. 2021Mastering Atari Games with Limited Datacited by 237
  12. 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
18 more
  1. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  2. 2019Explainability Fact Sheets: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable Approachescited by 101
  3. 2018Simple random search provides a competitive approach to reinforcement learningcited by 75
  4. 2017Flow: A Modular Learning Framework for Mixed Autonomy Trafficcited by 73
  5. 2022Do Language Models Plagiarize?cited by 73
  6. 2019Algorithms for Fairness in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 56
  7. 2021User Tampering in Reinforcement Learning Recommender Systemscited by 23
  8. 2021Ethics Sheets for AI Taskscited by 18
  9. 2020Data Readiness Reportcited by 17
  10. 2020A Methodology for Creating AI FactSheetscited by 15
  11. 2019Towards Traceability in Data Ecosystems using a Bill of Materials Modelcited by 12
  12. 2021T-RECS: A Simulation Tool to Study the Societal Impact of Recommender Systemscited by 12
  13. 2022Choices, Risks, and Reward Reports: Charting Public Policy for Reinforcement Learning Systemscited by 12
  14. 2021Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilitiescited by 9
  15. 2021A Map of Bandits for E-commercecited by 9
  16. 2021AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Riskscited by 6
  17. 2021Axes for Sociotechnical Inquiry in AI Researchcited by 5
  18. 2021Multisource AI Scorecard Table for System Evaluationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 7; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area: