mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Axes for Sociotechnical Inquiry in AI Research

arXiv 2105.06551 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2021cs.CY cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has far exceeded the investigation of their relationship with society. Sociotechnical inquiry is needed to mitigate the harms of new technologies whose potential impacts remain poorly understood. To date, subfields of AI research develop primarily individual views on their relationship with sociotechnics, while tools for external investigation, comparison, and cross-pollination are lacking. In this paper, we propose four directions for inquiry into new and evolving areas of technological development: value--what progress and direction does a field promote, optimization--how the defined system within a problem formulation relates to broader dynamics, consensus--how agreement is achieved and who is included in building it, and failure--what methods are pursued when the problem specification is found wanting. The paper provides a lexicon for sociotechnical inquiry and illustrates it through the example of consumer drone technology.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2021.

Builds on

27 of 89 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  3. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  5. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
  6. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  7. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
  8. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 300
  9. 2017Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Modelscited by 206
  10. 2017Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability: A Brief Overview and Recent Advancescited by 201
  11. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 184
  12. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 165
15 more
  1. 2017A General Safety Framework for Learning-Based Control in Uncertain Robotic Systemscited by 163
  2. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
  3. 2017AI Safety Gridworldscited by 110
  4. 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 108
  5. 2016The Off-Switch Gamecited by 97
  6. 2016Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligencecited by 74
  7. 2017When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Expertscited by 41
  8. 2020Machine Learning Explainability for External Stakeholderscited by 17
  9. 2019A Mulching Proposalcited by 14
  10. 2018A Scalable Framework For Real-Time Multi-Robot, Multi-Human Collision Avoidancecited by 10
  11. 2017Incorrigibility in the CIRL Frameworkcited by 9
  12. 2018Towards Distributed Energy Services: Decentralizing Optimal Power Flow with Machine Learningcited by 8
  13. 2019What is the Point of Fairness? Disability, AI and The Complexity of Justicecited by 7
  14. 2021AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Riskscited by 6
  15. 2019Personal Universes: A Solution to the Multi-Agent Value Alignment Problemcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

5 papers.