mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilities

arXiv 2105.02377 ↗First posted 6 May 2021cs.LG cs.IRcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing recommender systems focus primarily on matching users to content which maximizes user satisfaction on the platform. It is increasingly obvious, however, that content providers have a critical influence on user satisfaction through content creation, largely determining the content pool available for recommendation. A natural question thus arises: can we design recommenders taking into account the long-term utility of both users and content providers? By doing so, we hope to sustain more providers and a more diverse content pool for long-term user satisfaction. Understanding the full impact of recommendations on both user and provider groups is challenging. This paper aims to serve as a research investigation of one approach toward building a provider-aware recommender, and evaluating its impact in a simulated setup. To characterize the user-recommender-provider interdependence, we complement user modeling by formalizing provider dynamics as well. The resulting joint dynamical system gives rise to a weakly-coupled partially observable Markov decision process driven by recommender actions and user feedback to providers. We then build a REINFORCE recommender agent, coined EcoAgent, to optimize a joint objective of user utility and the counterfactual utility lift of the provider associated with the recommended content, which we show to be equivalent to maximizing overall user utility and the utilities of all providers on the platform under some mild assumptions. To evaluate our approach, we introduce a simulation environment capturing the key interactions among users, providers, and the recommender. We offer a number of simulated experiments that shed light on both the benefits and the limitations of our approach. These results help understand how and when a provider-aware recommender agent is of benefit in building multi-stakeholder recommender systems.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2021.

Builds on

15 of 38 references.

References · 15

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  2. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  3. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  4. 2015Session-based Recommendations with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 685
  5. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  6. 2018Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender Systemcited by 181
  7. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 155
  8. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  9. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  10. 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
  11. 2019RecSim: A Configurable Simulation Platform for Recommender Systemscited by 91
  12. 2016Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
3 more
  1. 2017Designing Fair Ranking Schemescited by 40
  2. 2018A Game-Theoretic Approach to Recommendation Systems with Strategic Content Providerscited by 33
  3. 2020Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approachcited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 1.

9 papers.