mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The ComMA Dataset V0.2: Annotating Aggression and Bias in Multilingual Social Media Discourse

arXiv 2111.10390 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2021cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we discuss the development of a multilingual dataset annotated with a hierarchical, fine-grained tagset marking different types of aggression and the "context" in which they occur. The context, here, is defined by the conversational thread in which a specific comment occurs and also the "type" of discursive role that the comment is performing with respect to the previous comment. The initial dataset, being discussed here (and made available as part of the ComMA@ICON shared task), consists of a total 15,000 annotated comments in four languages - Meitei, Bangla, Hindi, and Indian English - collected from various social media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Telegram. As is usual on social media websites, a large number of these comments are multilingual, mostly code-mixed with English. The paper gives a detailed description of the tagset being used for annotation and also the process of developing a multi-label, fine-grained tagset that can be used for marking comments with aggression and bias of various kinds including gender bias, religious intolerance (called communal bias in the tagset), class/caste bias and ethnic/racial bias. We also define and discuss the tags that have been used for marking different the discursive role being performed through the comments, such as attack, defend, etc. We also present a statistical analysis of the dataset as well as results of our baseline experiments with developing an automatic aggression identification system using the dataset developed.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2021.

Builds on

15 of 51 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  2. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 271
  3. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 207
  4. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 140
  5. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
  6. 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
  7. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 116
  8. 2019CONAN -- COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speechcited by 110
  9. 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 96
  10. 2019A Just and Comprehensive Strategy for Using NLP to Address Online Abusecited by 49
  11. 2017Detecting Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 42
  12. 2018Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Datacited by 40
3 more
  1. 2021Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2020: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in Indo-European Languagescited by 38
  2. 2020Developing a Multilingual Annotated Corpus of Misogyny and Aggressioncited by 33
  3. 2018Detecting weak and strong Islamophobic hate speech on social mediacited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

4 papers.