mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detecting weak and strong Islamophobic hate speech on social media

arXiv 1812.10400 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2018cs.CL cs.LG stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Islamophobic hate speech on social media inflicts considerable harm on both targeted individuals and wider society, and also risks reputational damage for the host platforms. Accordingly, there is a pressing need for robust tools to detect and classify Islamophobic hate speech at scale. Previous research has largely approached the detection of Islamophobic hate speech on social media as a binary task. However, the varied nature of Islamophobia means that this is often inappropriate for both theoretically-informed social science and effectively monitoring social media. Drawing on in-depth conceptual work we build a multi-class classifier which distinguishes between non-Islamophobic, weak Islamophobic and strong Islamophobic content. Accuracy is 77.6% and balanced accuracy is 83%. We apply the classifier to a dataset of 109,488 tweets produced by far right Twitter accounts during 2017. Whilst most tweets are not Islamophobic, weak Islamophobia is considerably more prevalent (36,963 tweets) than strong (14,895 tweets). Our main input feature is a gloVe word embeddings model trained on a newly collected corpus of 140 million tweets. It outperforms a generic word embeddings model by 5.9 percentage points, demonstrating the importan4ce of context. Unexpectedly, we also find that a one-against-one multi class SVM outperforms a deep learning algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutionscited by 66
  2. 2023You Only Prompt Once: On the Capabilities of Prompt Learning on Large Language Models to Tackle Toxic Contentcited by 39
  3. 2024From Languages to Geographies: Towards Evaluating Cultural Bias in Hate Speech Datasetscited by 25
  4. 2021"Short is the Road that Leads from Fear to Hate": Fear Speech in Indian WhatsApp Groupscited by 13
  5. 2023Uncovering Political Hate Speech During Indian Election Campaign: A New Low-Resource Dataset and Baselinescited by 8
  6. 2024DefVerify: Do Hate Speech Models Reflect Their Dataset's Definition?cited by 7
  7. 2024LionGuard: Building a Contextualized Moderation Classifier to Tackle Localized Unsafe Contentcited by 5
  8. 2021The ComMA Dataset V0.2: Annotating Aggression and Bias in Multilingual Social Media Discoursecited by 4
  9. 2021Tackling Racial Bias in Automated Online Hate Detection: Towards Fair and Accurate Classification of Hateful Online Users Using Geometric Deep Learningcited by 1
  10. 2024HarmPot: An Annotation Framework for Evaluating Offline Harm Potential of Social Media Textcited by 1
  11. 2023PACO: Provocation Involving Action, Culture, and Oppressioncited by 0
  12. 2024Hostility Detection in UK Politics: A Dataset on Online Abuse Targeting MPscited by 0
3 more
  1. 2025Dual-Class Prompt Generation: Enhancing Indonesian Gender-Based Hate Speech Detection through Data Augmentationcited by 0
  2. 2025Decoding Islamophobic Discourse: Using LLMs to Identify Tropes and Semi-Coded Hate Speechcited by 0
  3. 2025Tackling Social Bias against the Poor: A Dataset and Taxonomy on Aporophobiacited by 0