A Stationary (and Therefore Compatible) Representation is All You Need
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning compatible representations aims to learn feature representations that can be used interchangeably over time whenever a model undergoes updates. In this paper, we demonstrate that stationary representations learned by d-Simplex fixed classifiers imply compatibility as in its formal definition. This result establishes a foundation for future works and can be directly exploited in practical learning scenarios. We address the challenge of learning compatibility using d-Simplex fixed classifiers when the model is sequentially fine-tuned. Learning according to a d-Simplex fixed classifier with the cross-entropy loss aligns feature distributions at the first-order statistics. Consequently, it may not fully capture higher-order dependencies in the representation between model updates. To address this issue, we demonstrate that training the model using a d-Simplex fixed classifier through a convex combination of the cross-entropy loss and a contrastive loss not only captures higher-order dependencies, but is also equivalent to learning with the cross-entropy under the compatibility constraints. We confirm our findings with extensive experiments also considering a new scenario where a pre-trained model is sequentially fine-tuned and occasionally replaced with an improved model. We show that stationary representations enable uninterrupted retrieval services (without reprocessing gallery images) while improving performance during model updates and replacements, achieving state-of-the-art. Code at https://github.com/miccunifi/iamcl2r.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
50 of 68 references.
References · 50
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2019Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 734
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 451
38 more
- 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
- 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
- 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 226
- 2021Exploring Deep Neural Networks via Layer-Peeled Model: Minority Collapse in Imbalanced Trainingcited by 166
- 2021Neural Collapse Under MSE Loss: Proximity to and Dynamics on the Central Pathcited by 156
- 2020Neural collapse with unconstrained featurescited by 140
- 2022Forward Compatible Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learningcited by 125
- 2023Neural Collapse Inspired Feature-Classifier Alignment for Few-Shot Class Incremental Learningcited by 112
- 2020Memory-Efficient Incremental Learning Through Feature Adaptationcited by 107
- 2022Broken Neural Scaling Lawscited by 102
- 2022Inducing Neural Collapse in Imbalanced Learning: Do We Really Need a Learnable Classifier at the End of Deep Neural Network?cited by 100
- 2022Neural Collapse: A Review on Modelling Principles and Generalizationcited by 95
- 2021An Unconstrained Layer-Peeled Perspective on Neural Collapsecited by 87
- 2020Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 74
- 2021Deep Learning for Instance Retrieval: A Surveycited by 70
- 2021Lifelong Person Re-Identification via Adaptive Knowledge Accumulationcited by 57
- 2018Two-Player Games for Efficient Non-Convex Constrained Optimizationcited by 55
- 2023Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of Classescited by 39
- 2021Learning Compatible Embeddingscited by 37
- 2020Class-incremental Learning with Pre-allocated Fixed Classifierscited by 33
- 2020Unified Representation Learning for Cross Model Compatibilitycited by 30
- 2020Continual Representation Learning for Biometric Identificationcited by 25
- 2021Regular Polytope Networkscited by 24
- 2021Compatibility-aware Heterogeneous Visual Searchcited by 22
- 2022Towards Universal Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 20
- 2021Churn Reduction via Distillationcited by 17
- 2022Continual Learning for Visual Search with Backward Consistent Feature Embeddingcited by 17
- 2021CoReS: Compatible Representations via Stationaritycited by 14
- 2020On the Exploration of Incremental Learning for Fine-grained Image Retrievalcited by 12
- 2023Boundary-aware Backward-Compatible Representation via Adversarial Learning in Image Retrievalcited by 11
- 2021Dual-Tuning: Joint Prototype Transfer and Structure Regularization for Compatible Feature Learningcited by 8
- 2024Stationary Representations: Optimally Approximating Compatibility and Implications for Improved Model Replacementscited by 8
- 2025boldsymbolλ-Orthogonality Regularization for Compatible Representation Learningcited by 8
- 2022CL2R: Compatible Lifelong Learning Representationscited by 6
- 2023Maximally Compact and Separated Features with Regular Polytope Networkscited by 5
- 2024Anti-Forgetting Adaptation for Unsupervised Person Re-identificationcited by 5
- 2025Query Drift Compensation: Enabling Compatibility in Continual Learning of Retrieval Embedding Modelscited by 5
- 2025Learning Along the Arrow of Time: Hyperbolic Geometry for Backward-Compatible Representation Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.